All Forum Comments
Comment by Lilly posted on weekly competition: 34 Street Furniture at 27/02/2008 - 12:04
Comment by Lilly posted on Holkham Hall - HDR Warning!!! at 26/02/2008 - 16:49
Lilly - thanks for both explaining about teh possible sharpening and also that popping colour tip.
Given teh texture of teh granite would you ever reduce sharpening from whatever you would 'normally' use? When feeling confident about an image (I nearly said lazy) I tend to use SilkyPix and work from its presets. It has a default sharpening that it applies - would you expect to reduce this for an image like yours?
Mike
Also, sometimes after reducing size of pic for web it may need to be sharpened again slightly.
You just need to experiment.
Matt has some info on this subject on his web site.
Lilly
Comment by Lilly posted on Weekly competition 34: Street furniture at 03/03/2008 - 11:43
Secondly, re: your comment "My only reservation lies in the stone – has it suffered with sharpening?"
No, definitely not from sharpening, the texture you are seeing is that of good old Cornish granite which has the speckled look.
I have tried revealing colour on mono in many ways, history brush, hand tinting etc; some more complicated than others, however a few days ago my friend who also has a K10D (but is very shy to come on this forum yet!) posted me this very easy method, so here to share with you all is the link, have fun!
cheers Lilly
http://www.photoanswers.co.uk/Video-Tutorials/Search-Results/Imaging-Techniques/...
Comment by Lilly posted on Weekly competition 34: Street furniture at 03/03/2008 - 09:35
Comment by Lilly posted on Weekly competition 34: Street furniture at 29/02/2008 - 13:13
The proimaging service sounds great.
When developing JPEGs (from RAWs) from Silkypix for it, should they be in sRGB or AdobeRGB? I can't find the answer on their website.
I've seen the info on the colour profile - but all Silkypix can do with it is change the display option (which I will do).
Any tips on sharpening? How much more, relatively, needs to be applied compared to making images for viewing on a monitor? I know that's a "can of worms" question but any rough guidance at all may be helpful.
(I don't have Photoshop)
Cheers,
http://forum.proamimaging.com/viewtopic.php?t=2129
Comment by Lilly posted on Commercial printing, large size at 25/02/2008 - 13:22
Anyway, I will do it now and I see Pro Am reccommend Spyders, I see the Express is £65 & Suite is £125, double the price.
The only difference being Suite gives you:
Advanced features – including RGB pre-calibration function, multiple gamma and colour temperature options
&
ColourVision PrintFIX PLUS software
Is it worth paying double the price for these extra feature as I really do not understand what they actually do.
Lilly, thanks...
Comment by Lilly posted on Commercial printing, large size at 25/02/2008 - 11:48
Lilly,
For up to 18x12" I would always use Pro AM Imaging - www.proamimaging.com
You do have to fully prepare the image (upsize to correct pixels and apply a colour space transformation) but the price is stupidly low (£1 for an 18x12) and the quality is absolutely top drawer - I mean razor, razor sharp.
Anything bigger than that and I'm not too sure, except that I have a Photo Artistry 36x24" canvas hanging in my office which is awesome too http://www.photoartistry.co.uk/
(They do large format as well).
HTH!
Matt
Will def try Pro Am out, thanks, will keep you posted.
Thanks. Matt
Lilly
Comment by Lilly posted on Commercial printing, large size at 25/02/2008 - 11:10
Has anyone got any recommendations for mail order companies that they have had good results from, please.
cheers, Lilly
Comment by Lilly posted on Commercial printing, large size at 25/02/2008 - 10:29
I don't particulary like to mess about with my images with unnecessary filters, but in certain cases I think it is allowed.
Comment by Lilly posted on mono trees at 21/02/2008 - 22:22



cheers Lilly