All Forum Comments
Comment by laurencea posted on A zoom longer than18-55 for birds and wildlife? at 21/05/2010 - 12:39
Comment by laurencea posted on Nice used equipment anyone? Inc. K-7... at 20/05/2010 - 21:27
I tried the in camera editing, but no joy.
i did transfer the files to the laptop, but can't open them, even with preview. looks like those 5 shots have been lost.
That's my first duff card, i get them from 7dayshop - usually get the unmarked ones, but this time went for some fuji ones - and never had a problem - that'll teach me to switch brands.
just taken some more shots to see if any of those die and i'll use a different card from now on.
thanks again.
L
Comment by laurencea posted on recovering duff images at 14/04/2010 - 20:35
It was in my k200d and out of 200+ shots, five were corrupt. the odd thing is, they show up ok on image capture (on a Mac) and also on the screen on the back of the camera. when i tried to upload them to flickr they didn't go. they are taking up space on the cards equivalent to a good shot, but iphoto and pentax browser software says the file type isn't recognised.
any ideas or are the images gone?
cheers
laurence
Comment by laurencea posted on recovering duff images at 13/04/2010 - 21:22
the 50 is a good lens to use them with...

although, at times, you do have to have a very trusting subject!
Comment by laurencea posted on Extesion tubes at 08/03/2010 - 21:49
Comment by laurencea posted on Hi all from edinburgh at 08/03/2010 - 21:43
1) everything by Robyn Hitchcock (including Soft Boys)
2) Eveything by r.e.m.
3) in the aeroplane over the sea - neutral milk hotel
4) hollywood town hall - the jayhwaks
5) concert program - penguin cafe orchestra
Comment by laurencea posted on Favourite albums of all time at 17/02/2010 - 22:37
lovely shot and snake
Comment by laurencea posted on I have my eye on you ... at 07/02/2010 - 16:44
i was chatting with someone yesterday (a c***n user) about Tamron lenses and the 70-300 in particular. on another forum someone had asked about Tamron and people said they are good "apart from the 70-300". I've never had a problem with the lens and most of my shots are with the lens. this shot proves what a great bit of kit it is. i do suspect some snobbery - it's not expensive, therefore rubbish! i also suspect that other makes of camera users might not like it as it won't have shake reduction!
Comment by laurencea posted on Seagull on the beach at 07/02/2010 - 14:47
i've seen some lovely mallard 'mongrels', black and white, tan, almost all white - and they have had chicks, most of who are 'normal' coloured.
Comment by laurencea posted on Smew or not? at 27/01/2010 - 19:52


i use a Tamron 500 and the biggest problems are due to light. they do like it to be bright, not just for shutter speed, but also for image quality. they tend to look very flat on a dull day even with enough light for a fast speed. oh and the focus range is tiny! it is the narrowest f8 ever.
also... the Tamron has a long focus throw, it's a wide lens and if you're going for a moving target it's a pig to focus qhick enough. attaching a ship's wheel might be a good idea.
however... for nature reserves where you're in a hide, looking at wildlife on a lake or scrape, or on the coast, it's a great lens to have.
my main lens is the much-maligned Tamron 70-300 which i have had no problms with!