Some CMOS, CCD or other new technology,
isn´t matter for me, such as 12MP or 15MP ...
I expect better sensor than K-x.
I prefer better ISO or better quality of picture.

But I know, that Kodak make sensors for Pentax 645D,
so we can expect some theoretical cooperation in this category ...

... such as Fuji´s sensor is sci-fi

But old good camera such as FF Pentax MZ-5n or MF Pentax 645N II with Fuji´s films still is Winner in the quality of picture.

There is a similar pohotos from K-x:

1) link

2) link

3) link

4) link

5) link

6) link

7) link

7a) link

Congratulation !!!

but:
I like a native light and the Pentax K-x allows me to take some pictures with it. I think that this camera has the best sensor in the Pentax K product line. What a pity, Pentax reduced some interest and important functions and connectors, which don´t have a major effect in the factory price ... Didn´t want to be a rival for his K-7.

Implementation of body isn´t importance such as waterproof, material, ergonomic etc., but vice versa - a function possibilities are important.

What a pity, if the Pentax wouldn´t reduce this features
then the K-x would jump very high his rivals and the K-x would be a strong progress in the entry level category.

Maybe Samsung or Sony, but why not Kodak?

I like a native light and the Pentax K-x allows me to take some pictures with it. I think that this camera has the best sensor in the Pentax K product line. What a pity, Pentax reduced some interest and important functions and connectors, which don´t have a major effect in the factory price ... Didn´t want to be a rival for his K-7.

Implementation of body isn´t importance such as waterproof, material, ergonomic etc., but vice versa - a function possibilities are important.

What a pity, if the Pentax wouldn´t reduce this features
then the K-x would jump very high his rivals and the K-x would be a strong progress in the entry level category.