All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on Someone's Lost Memories at 10/03/2010 - 11:22
I think contrast maybe sacrificed in the HDR process? It appears to look like fill flash.. sort of...
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Daylight HDR at 10/03/2010 - 11:18
Original at 0 exp comp. Some sharpening

HDR version with some desaturation and same sharpening as above.

It would seem that colour balance may also be required?
Any comments?
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Daylight HDR at 10/03/2010 - 11:14
This is an exciting new option that will be fast to use and very manageable in the field. Looks good to me!
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on news on the 645D about crop? at 10/03/2010 - 08:25
I agree with the Dx statement as the other brands of MF use the Kodak KAF3900 sensor that is 50.7mm x 39mm, the Pentax uses 44mm x 33mm. It is a cropped sensor. Proven in the Pentax literature for the new 55mm lens for the 645 that the square lens hood option cannot be used on existing 645 bodies as it causes vignetting.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on news on the 645D about crop? at 10/03/2010 - 08:17
Ken has some really strong opinions, but a lot of them are just hilarious. Why do you have 11 AF points when all you need is 1? Why do you need 77 segment metering when all you need is one? Someone needs to call for a whaaaambulance.
I shoot all my APS C DSLR's using only the centre focus point so I do only need one AF point. I generally use centre weighted and spot metering as well.
The sales figures will show how well the 645Dx has been accepted.
I initially wanted one, now I don't because I don't thing $9500 is worth paying, regardless of the price of other MF systems and I am happy with the range of equipment I presently use.
The other point now is that existing 645 lenses will also have a crop factor due to the Dx size sensor in the new body. The new lens launched alongside the camera has a square hood option that cannot be used on older 645 glass as it causes vignetting.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on news on the 645D about crop? at 10/03/2010 - 07:53
link
It is good reading. IMO.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Someone tell me I don't need a SMC-K 50mm f1.2 at 10/03/2010 - 05:28
link
For the true Pentaxian, it stirs up some emotions. You have been warned.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on news on the 645D about crop? at 10/03/2010 - 05:14
Please stop with the crop factor thing, if Whelmed has only use an APS-C camera then a crop factor wouldn't mean a thing for him only complicating things.
And burden, what burden?
An 400mm f/4 is certainly lighter then a 600mm f/4
So Whelmed if you find photography hard enough already and never used an 135 camera then forget what those two guys above me said about crop factor, just forget it since you don't need it then. It makes photography a lot simpler
Who mentioned weight of lenses? The comparison is for the magnification factor only.
I agree that for people who have never used FF or 35mm film cameras that they would not need to worry, but what is wrong with knowing the actual effect of using a lens on a camera that it was not designed for?
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Someone tell me I don't need a SMC-K 50mm f1.2 at 10/03/2010 - 04:47


Regards