All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on No more Pentax for me!... at 13/10/2010 - 00:21
the hitman (not sure how you see the road)?

900 Horse power and a few more $

Sunseeker

Tattoo

Mandurah Marina

Some serious toys around here.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Australian toys at 12/10/2010 - 11:19
Comment by K10D posted on A dangerous hobby at 12/10/2010 - 08:22
Comment by K10D posted on a selection of Pentax fit glass at 11/10/2010 - 12:42
Comment by K10D posted on worth another look? at 11/10/2010 - 12:18
Oh aye, that one!
Totally forgot about the shutter........
note to self, stop working whilst answering posts.....
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on K7 appears that light is getting in from the viewfinder at 11/10/2010 - 11:56
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on K7 appears that light is getting in from the viewfinder at 11/10/2010 - 08:17
glance

liquid

hair clip

eyes closed

boats

pose

R44

moored

Regards
Comment by K10D posted on winters approach at 10/10/2010 - 12:21

You can have anything you want on a reg plate in WA.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on three wings @ 10mm at 09/10/2010 - 13:47



I do wish people would read and understand what I have written in this thread before commenting. I am beginning to think that some of you are deliberately misunderstanding.
For the last time... IT IS ABOUT THE LENSES!!!!!.. ONLY THE LENSES!!
I have a lot of lenses, some very expensive, some very cheap, but ALL made for 35mm format. All together they are worth very much more than my DSLR.. Or any Dslr made by Pentax. So they constitute the greater part of my photographic equipment. Yes, I know that they can still be used on a crop sensor camera. I DO use them on a crop sensor camera, BUT... My 24mm lens is not a wide angle lens anymore. It is a standard on the istD. The 50mm is not a standard anymore. It is a short telephoto. My longed for Vivitar 35-85 Varifocal is not a wide to moderate lens on a crop sensor. It is a standard to long telephoto, instead.
If I had no camera and no lenses and were starting from scratch, It wouldn't be an issue. I probably wouldn't want a FF. Wouldn't feel the need for it. But I have the lenses. They mean more to me than the camera. The camera has a short life and is pretty much disposable. The lenses will last a lifetime. They do not wear out or die like cameras. I have them already and do not want to sell them. I value them more than I will value any Dslr body. They are primary. The camera body is secondary. I want a camera that will match the intended use of the lenses, rather than the lenses being compromised on a less important part of the kit (the camera body). Nothing to do with image quality. Just MY lenses.
Geddit now?.. LENSES LENSES LENSES.. IT'S ABOUT THE FRICKIN' LENSES. NOTHING ELSE, JUST MY BLOODY LENSES!
I'm impressed with the K5 spec's and initial results but I've had high ISO low noise for 17 months....so I tend not to get too excited by it today.
All of my Minolta glass is 35mm/FF. I miss the wide angle loss. If I ever get a good price on an FF Sony, I may jump in.
The glass is most important, fast glass, more so.
Best of luck with your choices.
Regards