PLUS

K10D

Joined: 16th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

K10D
Yup, it's a fine piece of glass.

A great set of images as well to prove it!

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Autumn with a wide aperture (7 images) at 18/10/2010 - 11:50

K10D
Algernon wrote:
K10D wrote:
Just another single axis option.

Really Right Stuff

link

This shows what I consider to be a correct approach to mono pod use.

These guys also do very nice ball heads.

Best regards
Hey Gary, If you want really solid support just get one
of these suckers (the biggest you can find) and screw the
bent part straight into the tripod bush on the camera with
a 1/4" screw

Comment Image


Having said that I wouldn't mind one of these Novoflex 2 way
heads just to crank an offset at the top of a monopod
bit too expensive though.

link

A B&S just cant take the force involved
The pointy end would be painful around the crown jewels if it slips from the butt cup when using free style!!!

The Novo's no good in sandy environments, its a dirt trap.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Bike race camera/lens conundrum at 18/10/2010 - 11:17

K10D
First three, but a very good set.

Well photographed.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on St. Mary's Island and Lighthouse at 18/10/2010 - 11:11

K10D
Just another single axis option.

Really Right Stuff

link

This shows what I consider to be a correct aproach to monopod use.

These guys also do very nice ball heads.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Bike race camera/lens conundrum at 18/10/2010 - 08:20

K10D
Hypocorism wrote:


Plus, the only real reason where a head of any type is required is for tilting or swinging the camera into portrait mode. If you can get away with only shooting landscape with the pod mostly upright, then no problem.


In contrast that Manfrotto 2-axis head only suggested by someone earlier is more expensive just by itself in the same store:
http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au/prod1061.htm
plus is only rated at 2.5kg.

.R.
So what is the lens collar for on telephoto lenses?

Now if your telephoto lens does not have a lens collar, there are other supports available to help, but try to use the right tool for the job.

Compromise at any price is still compromise.

Any idea what the 2.5Kg refers to?

Just to put things into perspective, I use the above head (2.5Kg rated) with much larger weights. It is also modified with plastic pads to allow a more fluid movement. I never use it locked tight, rather tensioned to a fluid like feel. The 2.5 Kg figure refers to the maximum load it will take locked (depending on balance and fulcrum of the lens & camera). It will not break if used with heavier weight equipment.

As I said earlier, each to their own.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Bike race camera/lens conundrum at 18/10/2010 - 07:34

K10D
Worked a few streets in Fremantle today. Very busy and full of characters.

stud

Comment Image


manic street photographer

Comment Image


at the counter

Comment Image


Apollo

Comment Image


keep out

Comment Image


track litter

Comment Image


mid day hit

Comment Image



Very high contrast today. Shoot/don't shoot? Fill flash (and announce your presence?), several hundred shots later and still PP.

The 50-135 is a great piece of glass but I really need a 70-200 with me.
The extra pulling power suits street work better.

Regards

Comment by K10D posted on Fremantle street activity at 17/10/2010 - 14:55

K10D
Had a run up to Whiteman Park, just north of Perth.

Model aircraft flying display, however,I saw a few other subjects.

Air foil designer

Comment Image


Upstanding

Comment Image


poser

Comment Image


C&C welcome

Regards

Comment by K10D posted on Whiteman Park at 16/10/2010 - 14:12

K10D
Algernon wrote:


If a single axis head were such a good idea it's strange neither Gitzo or Linhof make one. You could quite easily kick the monopod with your foot or catch it on a stone whilst carrying it and something will have to give, because it's acting like a rigid crow bar.
Many marques don't make certain items, that does not mean don't use it. If we were limited to current Pentax glass, we would not have an equivalent 8-16mm.

When I carry a mono pod, I retract it. I also use a groin pad (boat rod type) for use with the mono pod at times. I have yet to see photographers at golf and F1 events (I've done a few of each) using tripods. All use heavy duty mono's and some don't use heads on them. Some free hand.

Each to their own.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Bike race camera/lens conundrum at 16/10/2010 - 00:46

K10D
Exemplary images.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Panes & Panels - Project , or P&P-P at 15/10/2010 - 13:24

K10D
Algernon wrote:
A monopod is a very poor support, but there's nothing wrong with
a decent ball head such as a small Linhof, otherwise you have to
lean the monopod away from vertical and then apply extra force to
steady it. To stand any chance the monopod needs to be vertical.
It's also safer if the monopod gets a sudden jar the ball
will slip before ripping the threaded socket out of your camera.

It's better to use a monopod over your shoulder like a rifle.
Have you used a mono pod much?

With this head link on it, it's the next best thing to a Wimberly. Mono pod heads are single axis for a reason.

What sort of sudden jar are we talking about here?

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Bike race camera/lens conundrum at 15/10/2010 - 13:21

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo