johnwhit

Joined: 27th April 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnwhit
Hi Howard, I really like the first one with the inclusion of the signal box and signal. I find the tree in the second a liitle distracting TBH. Great detail and colour in the third.

Nice tones in version #2 Cliff and I like the alternative narrowboat shot, I stll like the silhouette shot originally posted, maybe in colour at sunrise/sunset later in the year

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Black 5 duo at 13/05/2011 - 10:35

johnwhit
A third vote here for the DA*300, it gets used more than my Tamron 90 Di, mainly because I can keep my distance, but often just the fact that it's on the camera when the opportunity arrises. Here's a recent one from Frodsham Marshes:

[IMG]http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac49/johnwhit24/Frodsham_marshes/Butterfly_2.jpg[/IMG]

But it's pricey

I've had good results with the Tamron 70-300 LD Di, and it's as cheap as chips, well recommended.

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Longer focal length for wildlife at 13/05/2011 - 08:38

johnwhit
I like the first Cliff, nice silhouette shot, as Stephen says a very industrial feel. The narrowboat's a classic, lovely composition. I was a little way up the track on a public footpath, chatting with a local when she came through, almost missed it altogether But managed a couple of shots as she passed. This is the best I could manage in the very dull conditions + 0.7 EV.

[IMG]http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac49/johnwhit24/Black%205%20Duo/Black_5duo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac49/johnwhit24/Black%205%20Duo/Black_5duo_2.jpg[/IMG]

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Black 5 duo at 12/05/2011 - 17:24

johnwhit
Smeggypants wrote:
I'd take the Siggy 24-70 and use the 10-20 ( which you're already taking for wider stuff.

It's a bit bigger? So what!
+1

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Which would you take? at 11/05/2011 - 08:31

johnwhit
As above, you have to do the math.

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on A 1.7 with a teleplus 2x at 10/05/2011 - 15:01

johnwhit
gartmore wrote:
14mm f2.8 Samyang is £260, probably pretty good
Providing you're not doing architecture it's better than pretty good....stunning!

http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/533-samyang14f28eosapsc

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on What's the cheapest price wide angle lenses start at? at 10/05/2011 - 12:34

johnwhit
johnriley wrote:
In terms of travel I've come around to using zooms, basically because time is always short and they are far more versatile. Ideal travel lenses are the 18-55mm, 16-45mm and 12-24mm. The 16-50mm is IMHO very fine but heavy and bulky compared to the 16-45mm.
........not forgetting the DA 17-70 of course
Not much bigger or heavier than the 16-45, it fits in the same lens pouch.

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on 14mm or 15mm at 08/05/2011 - 09:25

johnwhit
Frogfish wrote:


You could buy any of those macro lenses (you said you don't need WR) and be very happy with your purchase. They are all superb.
Absolutely, it has to come down to personal choice, maybe go to somewhere that has them all in stock and handle them on camera if you're considering buying new. The Tamron was just my personal choice.

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Macro Lens Advice, Please at 08/05/2011 - 09:23

johnwhit
The Tamron SP Di 90mm is true 1:1 also, wihout any tube attached as in the older version. Hope this helps.

http://www.photozone.de/pentax/362-tamron-af-90mm-f28-di-sp-macro-pentax-

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Macro Lens Advice, Please at 07/05/2011 - 21:48

johnwhit
Thanks Chris, much appreciated.

Kind regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Macro Lens Advice, Please at 07/05/2011 - 21:22

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo