PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Unfortunately all my favourite films are disappearing fast.

Comment by johnriley posted on best colour film at 09/07/2012 - 23:36

johnriley
JPS are the people for the DSLRs, being the official Pentax repair house. But it sounds more like an insurance claim to me too.

Comment by johnriley posted on What is the problem with my Pentax K-r? Advice please! at 09/07/2012 - 20:51

johnriley
Please, please don't quote spammers' posts, it can escape attention and makes an extra post to delete.

Many thanks.

Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 09/07/2012 - 19:41

johnriley
Can you change your last post to a PM please Steven, it's absolutely full of e-mail links which is not a good thing on a forum.

Many thanks.

Comment by johnriley posted on email help at 09/07/2012 - 16:04

johnriley
I like the image and I also liked the X90 when I had one. The close focus is very impressive.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax X90 at 09/07/2012 - 15:16

johnriley
This is all pretty much anecdotal, from blogs and forums.

In normal use and after thousands of images with various Pentax lenses I haven't seen any problem whatsoever.

I think it's a pity that this sort of thing can be taken to heart by those who aren't sure and it can prevent them from enjoying a product that delivers the goods. I don't see the point in needlessly discouraging people.

Comment by johnriley posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 12:55

johnriley
We digress as these tests bear little relation to a discussion about the K-5 and the FA 50mm f1.4 lens. Standardising on the NEX-3 is a bit random as well and probably won't have much relevance to our Pentax cameras/lenses, which is what we use.

Comment by johnriley posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 12:00

johnriley
Thanks for the clarification Brian, I was making a generalised comment, just musing as the thread develops.

Comment by johnriley posted on Testing k-5 weatherproofness... at 09/07/2012 - 11:58

johnriley
I tend to wipe the lens barrel beforezooming it back in, just in case water finds a way in. I suppose it will also depend on how much rain there is. Normal drizzle and even quite a heavy shower seems OK, but the 18-135mm has simplified weather resistance, it isn't waterproof. It isn't billed as dust resistant either.

Common sense should always rule and it's a matter of judgement how much rain we're prepared to accept. I would always partially protect the kit at least, if possible, but haven't found a problem yet. Basically, if it's too wet for me then it's too wet for the camera.

Now, how to define what's too wet for me....:

Comment by johnriley posted on Testing k-5 weatherproofness... at 09/07/2012 - 11:44

johnriley
Are you reading the same thing as I am there Algi? It clearly shows for the 35mm f2.4 lens that CA is lower using the K-5.

Comment by johnriley posted on The FA 50 F1.4 and the K-5 at 09/07/2012 - 11:21

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo