PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Yes, it's compatible. I've removed the actual link as, apart from BIN items, the general consensus here has been that putting eBay links in spoils the chance of getting a bargain. Some members object quite strongly, so best avoided.

Comment by johnriley posted on eBay Marriage - MZ6 + DA 18-55mm at 18/06/2013 - 16:02

johnriley
You're missing that there is a filter to replace the AA filter, otherwise focus would be off. It's a clear filter, but obviously coated as per the original.

It's been very well documented in tests on the internet and in magazines, covering Pentax and Nikon but also many new cameras that also have no AA filter. The Pentax Q series and the Ricoh GR are two recent examples of cameras with no AA filter.

It seems to be the way things are going.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5II choice considerations - a new take at 18/06/2013 - 15:59

johnriley
Resilvering a mirror is a highly skilled job. Perhaps a Google search for lens repairers? It a bit more than just an average repair though.

Comment by johnriley posted on Tamron mirror lens-Pentax *isdS at 18/06/2013 - 15:55

johnriley
Very good, using a fisheye is not easy.

Comment by johnriley posted on First batch with the Q fish eye at 18/06/2013 - 12:31

johnriley
Very nice kit. It would look even better in one of those snazzy aluminium fitted cases....

Comment by johnriley posted on Q7 complete kit - form a Q at 18/06/2013 - 12:29

johnriley
Quote:
Same model of lens perhaps, but same example?
Same model is fine, but same sample can be tricky, depending on when the review samples arrive. For example, the K-5 II and IIs were received at EPZ several weeks apart, so when I did the IIs report it was very difficult to remove all variables.

However, it didn't take long to establish what I wanted to know for my own future purposes.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5II choice considerations - a new take at 18/06/2013 - 09:32

johnriley
Quote:
...the production cost of most of the 'extra' features that differentiated very similar Sony camcorder models was only about 20-30p per 'extra', say £1.50 - £2 per step up...
This isn't quite the same thing. It's referring to enabling extra electronic features, which are indeed very low cost.

In the case of the K-5 II and IIs there is a physical difference. A smaller production line has to be run where the AA filter is replaced by a plain filter glass. It's no doubt the smaller run that causes the increase in price. Plus of course the promotion and distribution of what amounts to a different model.

However, the most relevant point is that it is more expensive, which is the reality of it.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5II choice considerations - a new take at 18/06/2013 - 00:04

johnriley
Could you post some examples please?

Comment by johnriley posted on K5-lls overexposure at 17/06/2013 - 23:27

johnriley
The Pentax lens is an excellent one.

I've no experience of the Tamron, but I would say that 28mm is not particularly wide angle, being a 35mm-equivalent of 42mm, a "wide standard".

Comment by johnriley posted on Tamron 28-300 vs pentax 55-300 at 17/06/2013 - 21:57

johnriley
SDM failures are a thing of the distant past MyCynical. Lenses that did fail were fixed under warranty and SDM motors now seem to be very reliable.

The new 18-270mm seemed to be a suitable candidate for a DC motor, but it is actually marked up as SDM. So the DC motor lens seems at this time to be a one-off, not a conspiracy.

Comment by johnriley posted on 18-135mm WR Users Opinions at 17/06/2013 - 21:53

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo