All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Quality Prints from the Q-S1 at 13/11/2014 - 11:53
Comment by johnriley posted on Custom image settings at 12/11/2014 - 23:46
Comment by johnriley posted on Ricoh GR £369 Amazon lighting deal at 12/11/2014 - 17:55
Comment by johnriley posted on Motorsport: Neil Howard Stages Rally, Oulton Park at 10/11/2014 - 08:09
Comment by johnriley posted on Mark Littlejohn at 10/11/2014 - 08:07
Comment by johnriley posted on Sigma 50-150 f2.8 lens at 09/11/2014 - 17:35
Comment by johnriley posted on Sigma 50-150 f2.8 lens at 09/11/2014 - 16:50
Comment by johnriley posted on Cheap effective reflectors at 09/11/2014 - 09:58
It's all part of watching and manipulating the light on a subject. A reflector can also be used to shield, say a waving plant in the wind, or perhaps to hold back other foliage as well as reflecting light.
I'm sure there must be some on eBay at low prices that you could try out before buying one from a dealer?
Comment by johnriley posted on Cheap effective reflectors at 09/11/2014 - 09:10
Comment by johnriley posted on M42 lenses at 08/11/2014 - 13:54


The difference this time for me is that all three of my prints are from the Q-S1. I've printed them without any interpolation, 4000 x 3000 pixels at 300ppi as native to the camera output. This gives a print 33.87 x 25.4 cm, which fits with room to spare on an A3 sheet of paper.
OK, the images are slightly smaller than from the K-5, but still a decent size and the quality is very impressive. I've used images from the MX-1 before, and they have done very well. The fact is that they look no different when displayed to any other entries, be it from APS-C, FF or even smartphones. There have been a few smartphone images entered that have just been accepted alongside everything else.
I'll let you know how the images do, but actual image quality won't be a problem. The content is something else of course.