PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
George in Georgia USA wrote:
Shooting both digital (K10D) and film, (LX, MX, ME Super, Retina IIIc) I've always wondered why we couldn't have the fine old Compur style cable release on digital cameras? If, as I suspect, the shutter button is little more than a switch on my K10, why couldn't a Compur cable release press that switch? Please, no Leica style cable releases! The little trim ring which had to be unscrewed from the shutter button is too easily lost!

Granted, it is really nice to be able to release the shutter from many feet away, but the old style cable releases never suffered from dead button cells!

Inquiring minds want to know....
Some digital cameras have had conventional cable release sockets, but my guess is that it's easier and cheaper to install an electronic version.

Don't forget that old style releases can cause a lot of damage if used over-enthusiastically. Some of the plungers are far too long to be safe.

Comment by johnriley posted on shutter cable release at 17/03/2010 - 17:41

johnriley
Quote:
The forum software here should scale down any image you post to 800 wide - although it still downloads the full size version, so don't post a 1 megabyte jpeg Flickr's 1024 pixel 'medium' size works reasonably well.

The click through to Flickr doesn't work unfortunately. I haven't found a way to hyperlink an image on this forum.
But if you do this we have to scroll from side to side and the resizing affects the quality. Much better to resize in Photoshop and upload the correct size to Photobucket. Don't let Photobucket resize either, it's not as good a result.

Comment by johnriley posted on stream/waterfall shot at 17/03/2010 - 17:20

johnriley
Hardgravity wrote:


Are you serious about NEVER using film again?

What would happen in that 'I've had my camera nicked' situation on holiday?
I'd go along with that, although I am actually about to shoot some film for a project. I don't miss film at all, it's always been about making the images, not the medium.

Comment by johnriley posted on Shooting on film at 17/03/2010 - 17:16

johnriley
We have computers using only 1GB of RAM that will quite happily run Photoshop CS2, Photoshop 7 or Photoshop Elements 7. Adnittedly this is the lowest that is useable, give or take, but anything you buy now should exceed this specification.

Our latest purchases have 4GB of RAM and video cards that have 1GB of their own RAM as well, all far in excess of what PS needs.

You do not need anything massively specified for imaging, but 4GB of RAM would be sensible. After that, buying the best monitor you can afford will be more useful. Not all monitors are good for imaging purposes.

Comment by johnriley posted on new computer for photoshop at 17/03/2010 - 16:21

johnriley
I wouldn't go so far as should as I know plenty of people who are excellent photographers and have never shot a frame of film in their lives. This will be incresingly so as time moves on. After all, how many of us have shot lantern slides?

I have mentioned though that shooting a slide film is a useful and interesting experience from which a number of lessons about composition, attention to detail and exposure can be learned.

Comment by johnriley posted on Shooting on film at 17/03/2010 - 08:33

johnriley
I think it varies. Sometimes I will know what I want to shoot for a particular subject, so one shot would do it. In this case I usually take two anyway, just to make sure that I have a sharp shot without camera shake.

If it's an experimental subject I'm not familiar with I might take any number until satisfied. There will be lots with minor differences but just one might stand out. This can happen especially where something is unfolding such as changing weather or the final gasp of a sunset.

Not every shot will be a masterpiece, nor does it need to be. Some are just illustrating a point or, for example, purely records of an item.

I have however found enough images that I like to put one a day on ePHOTOzine for the past five years!

Comment by johnriley posted on Shooting - Whats your style at 17/03/2010 - 08:28

johnriley
Fascinating stuff. Thanks, Martin.

Comment by johnriley posted on Newest info 645D at 16/03/2010 - 21:51

johnriley
impotentspider wrote:
Quote:
The future's bright,
Do they do Orange

But yes I have to agree, I think for a compact or entry level camera then having a bright colour would be cool, I cant see it catching on with semi/pro spec models though, I cant for the life of me imagine anyone buying a K7 in Mint Green
Don't forget things like the Royal Blue Jersey Rolleflex 2.8F, or the Gold and Platinum special editions, the gold Pentax Spotmatic, the LX special editions, and so on.

I have seriously contemplated a couple of coloured K-x cameras for weddings - they would grab attention and be remembered. I admit I haven't bought them yet.

Comment by johnriley posted on Rainbow Colours at 16/03/2010 - 21:22

johnriley
I actually quite like this new trend in different colours for cameras. It's not really new as Kodak box cameras were made in a variety of colours many many moons ago, but just recently we have got into a silber or black situation.

So now I have a nice red Optio P70, a seductively white I-10, and I notice even more shades coming onto the market. There's even a Mint Green Optio out there somewhere - I noticed it fleetingly on Amazon earlier.

And I haven't even mentioned those new K-x colours...The future's bright, the future's almost any colour you fancy.

Comment by johnriley posted on Rainbow Colours at 16/03/2010 - 21:08

johnriley
Here's the place to discuss and comment on this week's competition.

Comment by johnriley posted on Discussion Weekly Comp #141 - The Four Seasons at 15/03/2010 - 16:14

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo