All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on The Future of K5 Prices at 03/03/2011 - 17:27
Comment by johnriley posted on K7 K5 Gross Over Exposure Problem at 03/03/2011 - 16:27
Comment by johnriley posted on sony/minolta 135/2.8 STF on pentax? at 03/03/2011 - 16:05
It's not a matter of blame, it's a matter of elimination of possibilities.
Let's see picture 2 and we can progress an investigation in a rational manner.
Comment by johnriley posted on K7 K5 Gross Over Exposure Problem at 03/03/2011 - 11:51
My first thought is improper connection between lens and body, causing the lens to operate at maximum aperture. This would be possibly cured by cleaning lens and body electronic contacts (wipe with dry microfibre cloth) and making sure the lens was seated securely and firmly clicked into place.
However, let's wait for picture 2 and see where it takes us.
Comment by johnriley posted on K7 K5 Gross Over Exposure Problem at 03/03/2011 - 10:29
Comment by johnriley posted on Hi from Italy at 03/03/2011 - 10:21
Comment by johnriley posted on Urban Exploration - Urbex at 03/03/2011 - 10:12
Paper masks seem to need to be p3 type, whatever that is, but to be absolutely sure would need a full respirator, which is unrealistic.
So wear a good mask, don't kick up loads of dust, don't disturb anything, presumably move through the building ninja-like.
Hope that helps, but remember I'm not an expert on this so please investigate it for yourselves before putting yourselves in danger.
Comment by johnriley posted on Urban Exploration - Urbex at 03/03/2011 - 09:34
I have a friend who works in asbestos removal and it's an expensive business hiring him.
Wearing a msak would help, but it would need a good quality mask I think and not one that was constantly reused.
Comment by johnriley posted on Urban Exploration - Urbex at 03/03/2011 - 09:11
Comment by johnriley posted on The Future of K5 Prices at 03/03/2011 - 09:03

