PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Smeggypants wrote:
johnriley wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPdy52mR6Io

This is showing a test with an Olympus camera, but it is interesting because I suspect it gives clues as to why we are urged to switch off SR when using a tripod. See what happens when in-body is switched on with an already stabilised image.

I also thought that the in-body version seemed to act much more quickly than the in-lens version.

We can probably extrapolate this information to be of use when we use our Pentax cameras.
Why is that? Comment Image
Because it demonstrates that when the actual shake is not what the system expects, it can act in a spurious manner. I presume that to avoid the possibility of this we are recommended to play safe and switch SR off. Indeed, when the self timer is used a tripod is presumed and the camera makes sure by doing that for us.

Comment by johnriley posted on Image Stabilisation Test at 06/03/2011 - 18:04

johnriley
Quote:
I am not totally satisfied with my 16-50 in terms of optical quality and sluggish focus
Sounds like it needs attention, so don't put up with it, think about getting it back to JP Service Solutions to be fixed.

Comment by johnriley posted on Why is the Tamron 17-50 F2.8 not more popular? at 06/03/2011 - 12:30

johnriley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPdy52mR6Io

This is showing a test with an Olympus camera, but it is interesting because I suspect it gives clues as to why we are urged to switch off SR when using a tripod. See what happens when in-body is switched on with an already stabilised image.

I also thought that the in-body version seemed to act much more quickly than the in-lens version.

We can probably extrapolate this information to be of use when we use our Pentax cameras.

Comment by johnriley posted on Image Stabilisation Test at 06/03/2011 - 12:01

johnriley
No I don't, I'll save your camera from this fate by offering you the £20.

Please PM me your details for a PayPal payment.

Comment by johnriley posted on SF7 Body + AF240Z flash for sale at 06/03/2011 - 11:24

johnriley
If it's not sharp then something is clearly wrong. However, bear in mind the subject matter and make sure that the infinity subject isn't shrouded in haze!

Buildings are a good subject for distant shooting tests as they have very clear lines and seeing whether or not they are sharp is easier.

Also use a tripod for sharpness tests, aling with the 2 second self timer so the mirror is raised before the exposure. This ensures there is no vibration from the mirror to take the edge off the critical sharpness.

Comment by johnriley posted on infinity mark alignment at 06/03/2011 - 11:17

johnriley
I guess to facilitate transfer of data to the PC at higher speeds and for use with video shooting.

I don't personally buy fast cards and find that keeping to no larger than 4GB the transfer time to PC is reasonable enough.

Comment by johnriley posted on SDHC card compatibility for K20D at 06/03/2011 - 10:40

johnriley
Yes, please start a new thread for a new item for sale, otherwise few will notice it.

Comment by johnriley posted on FS: Tamron 70-300, Sigma 10-20, Pentax 35mm f2.4 at 06/03/2011 - 10:14

johnriley
lemmy wrote:
Quote:
My dealings with Johnson's did inspire confidence as they gave the impression of being very willing to help and did supply the replacement camera by next day delivery when I advised them that I was back from holiday. Their communication was excellent.
I am glad your experience was positive - but I can't quite see the relevance to my original post.

Are you saying that you think I am being unreasonable? I'm unsure for how long I should resign myself to being without my K5.

To address my question, how long would you have considered reasonable without communication or have been willing to wait?
You are clearly upset about the way things have gone, as is evidenced both here and elsewhere, but the solution was there at the beginning. Replace the camera or refund the money. The dealer was the one to do this. The general evidence is that, stocks permitting, most people are getting just that and very quickly.

I would simply ask for that refund now as they have not dealt with your situation within a reasonable time. You could then but a K-5 off the shelf from elsewhere, probably cheaper now, if you decide that you still want one. If you paid by credit card you will have additional consumer protection in that you can ask the credit card company to refund you if the shop will not.

Asking for the refund in writing might be helpful if you get any problem on the phone.

Hope that helps!

Comment by johnriley posted on K5 Problem - Am I Unreasonable? at 06/03/2011 - 10:09

johnriley
No idea what this means!

Comment by johnriley posted on powerbridge ist ds at 05/03/2011 - 19:05

johnriley
Being "technically poor" was Julia's technique, I don't use the two words to mean the same thing.

Technique is the method of working, whereas being technically excellent would be served by an image that possessed the very best of technical qualities.

If you see what I'm getting at!

Comment by johnriley posted on K-5 - How accurate can I expect the focussing to be? at 05/03/2011 - 19:04

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo