PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
I have mixed feelings about these - a fee is charged to enter, a percentage of images are chosen and increasingly the only place they get shown is on the CD or in the catalogue that is sent to the ones selected.

Then every acceptance adds another point towards awards that can be put after our names.

I just get the feeling it's a bit like buying a qualification, although it is true that we have to have our images selected. I'm still thinking about it.

What's the general feeling about these things?

Comment by johnriley posted on Photographic Salons at 15/11/2011 - 14:45

johnriley
There are only three variables that control the amount of light that hits the sensor.

Aperture and shutter speed are directly connected, so increase one and the other has to decrease to compensate.

ISO controls the sensitivity of the sensor (similar to the speed of the fim) and if increased means smaller apertures can be used whilst still keeping a hand-holdable shutter speed.

If you use Av, then in dark condition you'll need to open up the aperture to get the shutter speed up. If you use Tv under the same conditions then making the shutter speed right will adjust the aperture accordingly. So it really doesn't matter which way round you do it.

Personally I use Av to define the depth of field and if the shutter speed falls too low then I increase the ISO or use a tripod.

Comment by johnriley posted on camera settings at 15/11/2011 - 11:42

johnriley
You can make an argument Ed without being abusive to others. With freedoms come responsibilities, a principle well known and understood in the world we live in today.

Comment by johnriley posted on Cold ,wet and dark Whitby! at 15/11/2011 - 10:21

johnriley
I've removed the quote from the deleted post. Unfortunate timing I think....

Comment by johnriley posted on Cold ,wet and dark Whitby! at 15/11/2011 - 10:10

johnriley
Quote:
In that case I will PM him with the same comment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you do and he complains, you will get a 7 day ban for abuse of the PM system, so please don't.

Comment by johnriley posted on Cold ,wet and dark Whitby! at 15/11/2011 - 10:02

johnriley
Offensive post removed, no more please.

Comment by johnriley posted on Cold ,wet and dark Whitby! at 15/11/2011 - 09:58

johnriley
Ironically, even before this thread was started we were discussing the subject.

There has been a clarification to the header and also a Guidelines Sticky has been provided. Please refer to that if in doubt.

Comment by johnriley posted on What is allowed in general chat? at 15/11/2011 - 09:56

johnriley
The purpose of Pentax User is to provide a resource for Pentax Users. The site in general, as detailed in the Terms of Use, is for Pentax and Pentax-related interest.

General Chat is an area where we discuss anything of general photographic interest that may be of interest to Pentax Users.

Other marques, religion and politics are off-topic. If the subject is basically photographic and of interest to our photography as Pentax Users then this is the place for it, if no other section seems appropriate.

There is a "Pointless Thread" for general gossip and chat. If in doubt, please enquire by PM.

Comment by johnriley posted on Guidelines for General Photographic Chat at 15/11/2011 - 09:28

johnriley
Please keep on topic in Classified Ads.

Comment by johnriley posted on WTB: Sigma 180 Macro at 15/11/2011 - 07:59

johnriley
Ah, if only you could see how cheerful I am as I reply to your missives Chris.

Now there's a thought - a webcam for the forum so we could all look at each other.

Comment by johnriley posted on What is allowed in general chat? at 14/11/2011 - 21:27

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo