johnnyboy114

Joined: 7th August 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnnyboy114
Thanks Christopher....I know, I would love to be able to spend $1000 (or the equivalent in £'s....) on a lens and one day, I will. But right now, budget is everything, which is annoying to be honest, so will jhave to make do with what I have. But I will take what you have said in and keep it as you have similar lenses to me(other than the 77mm) and it will all go in the knowledge bank! Thanks for your reply!

John

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Best portrait lens at 27/01/2010 - 07:34

johnnyboy114
Thanks Simon, I am more convinced I should stick with the 50mm and do as you said...but I like to use strobes as well, so the ISO isn't quite as important. Its just that its usually dark before they go off.....

BUt comments like yours convince me more. I shall hopefully post results on here. Thanks again!

J

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Best portrait lens at 18/01/2010 - 22:33

johnnyboy114
This is all excellent info guys. Thank you so much. Glad I registered here now...

I have used a video light doing a second shoot at a wedding in the evening, but it was only used to light up the subjects when the focusing couldn't cope in the low light. The shot was taken with it off and the flashes took over....I wouldn't have actually thought to use it as a main light. But fair point, they are quite bright and realise they could be used. Will bare all this in mind...thanks again!

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Best portrait lens at 18/01/2010 - 19:43

johnnyboy114
Yep, fair point Bret, I shall make sure I turn it off once focused....lol!



Cheers and good point well made! lol!

John

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Best portrait lens at 18/01/2010 - 19:02

johnnyboy114
All great information guys, thanks very much! I shall endeavour with the 50mm then and set the camera as suggested. See how that goes. And a video light does seem to be popular bit of advice too....I may have to invest in one.

So glad I don't have to buy another lens yet...lol! Cheers guys!

John

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Best portrait lens at 18/01/2010 - 14:47

johnnyboy114
Hi

I have a K100D, with an old manual 50mm f1.7, a Sigma 70-300 f4.5 and the kit lens and was wondering, what was the best portrait lens to use? I am thinking the 50mm as its more equivalent to 85mm and that its also a lot faster for a nicer DOF, but I really like the look of a telephoto lens for portraiture but not sure that the Sigma is up to the job, especially with the slower speed....

I am likely to be using the 50mm I guess, but I have a problem focusing it in the darker light most of my portraits will be taken in as I am useless at manual focusing without a split circle on the mirror! lol! Any tips on this? Or, is there a CHEAP alternative that might be worth considering for portraiture?

Any help and advice on this would be great. Thanks!

John

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Best portrait lens at 18/01/2010 - 13:08

johnnyboy114
I commented on the mono version of this on EPZ.....I think this is a superb image. Lighting for the type of photography you are going for is faultless...superb stuff!

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Headshot for C&C at 18/01/2010 - 13:01

johnnyboy114
Ah right! Nice one Dan! Thanks for that!

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Lens Rental at 07/01/2010 - 12:58

johnnyboy114
Hi Guys

Does anyone know of places that do Pentax lens rentals? Everywhere I look online, its those darn Nikon and Canon users that get all the perks. I would like to try out a few fast, long length lenses, but can't afford them at the moment, so if anyone has any ideas, can they let me know? Its getting frustrating now!

Cheers

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on Lens Rental at 07/01/2010 - 12:38

johnnyboy114
philstaff wrote:
johnnyboy114 wrote:
Quote:
Not sure if yours is a af or mf version this photo was taken with the mf 50mm 1.7 just wonderd how it compared with your lens.
Ian
That is indeed very, very sharp and looks fantastic. Have a look at the links I added to a further up the thread post. They are compressed, so don't give a true representation of the full image and I am on a different computer away from home at the moment, so dont have the image to upload, but some of mine DO look that sharp, others just don't at all. The more I see and the more I think about this, I am beginning to think its more to do with my focusing technique, which is worrying.....Oh and mine is a MF lens......
They look ok to me Johnny may be if you had been a tad closer to your subject there might have been more detail to see in the portrait. It took me a little while to get used to the mf and I do still get the odd duffer now and again to be honest with you but overall I realy like the results from these mf focus lenses I also added a 28,35mm to my kit. Getting back to the question of the thread the 90mm Tamron is very much liked by two freinds of mine for portraits.
Ian
Ian
Ian, thats reassuring to know you think the images look ok and sharp. Yes, close would probably bring out more detail, naturally, but then I guess its a good trade of with detail and composition. I guess I will just have to keep practicing and practicing......which is kind of the point really isn't it

Comment by johnnyboy114 posted on What lenses would be best for portrait work at 25/10/2009 - 09:02

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo