JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
MrB wrote:
Where does £700-£1400 come from? The SRS prices for the current HD DA Limiteds range from £359 for the 40mm to £567 for the 20-40 zoom. The latter is already WR, so why would it be suggested that prices of WR versions of the others (and including the the FA50 and FA35) would be beyond that range? Only the FA31 and FA77 WR would be justified in being that expensive, as they are now.

Philip
I thought I was being optimistic and admit just a guestimate. Most of the new quality lenses seem to start at a four figure sum,. The new 50mm f1.4 went from a circa £300 lens to a £1200 lens. Admittedly it was a redesign but people are asking for a redesign of the whole range where some of the existing ones start north of £700 already. The HD PENTAX-FA 35mm f/2 lens seems to be coming in at around double the current model so what would one expect a new FA 31, 43, 77, 85* etc to start at?
(Edit: An HD DFA* 85mm f1.4 is on the latest roadmap for release this year.)

Comment by JAK posted on Revamped FA 35mm f/2 rumor at 01/02/2019 - 22:35

JAK
Just to let you know that the results have now been posted.

Comment by JAK posted on Monthly #79 - A Standard Lens Photograph. Competition at 01/02/2019 - 17:52

JAK
One has to bear in mind that many who might buy any new ones are likely to already have one of the old ones. At around £700-£1400 per lens it would be an enormous outlay to upgrade them all and would be a huge gamble. It wouldn't really make sense to rush into doing them all.

Comment by JAK posted on Revamped FA 35mm f/2 rumor at 01/02/2019 - 17:20

JAK
Algernon wrote:
I can't remember Vivitar doing a 35mm K mount prime. They did the early 42mm screw mount in 35mm.--
You might not remember it, but they did!

Comment by JAK posted on Revamped FA 35mm f/2 rumor at 01/02/2019 - 12:48

JAK
Tyr wrote:
I wish they were revamping lenses like the DFA100WR with weather resistant construction.
They did! That is the updated version. Clue is in the WR.

Old one:
Comment Image

New one:
Comment Image

Comment by JAK posted on Revamped FA 35mm f/2 rumor at 31/01/2019 - 20:43

JAK
[quote:3496ace15f="Irek"]Hi, in Germany we can get them with 25% off
]https://shop-de.ricoh-imaging.eu/k-bajonett-objektive-hd-pentax-da11-18mm-f28-de...
That's close to the comparable price I was thinking it should be (actually slightly better) and from Ricoh's official store too.

Comment by JAK posted on DA★ 11-18mm coming soon ! at 31/01/2019 - 15:57

JAK
Strange lens discussions taking place this week So the 35mm f2 isn't fast enough and should be f1.4 yet the 11-18 f2.8 is too fast and would be better if it was an f4. Mmm. Can't please all of the people all of the time.

Comment by JAK posted on Revamped FA 35mm f/2 rumor at 31/01/2019 - 13:37

JAK
ilovesaabs wrote:
Don't forget US sales tax....... the price you see won't be the price you pay.
That must prove confusing!

Comment by JAK posted on DA★ 11-18mm coming soon ! at 31/01/2019 - 13:02

JAK
bforbes wrote:
Mike-P wrote:
Announced today

The US price is $1,399.95 LINK
Same number in GBP link
How come the GBP is at parity with the dollar now (in Ricoh land? Rip off Britain continues.
At the present exchange rate it should be no more than £1070.

Comment by JAK posted on DA★ 11-18mm coming soon ! at 31/01/2019 - 12:57

JAK
richandfleur wrote:
I've mentioned this previously, but kit lenses from other brands are typically crap. Like really bad.
Yes Pentax includes this lens in it's kits, but it's miles ahead of the traditional 'kit lens'.
You're absolutely right. Before I purchased my first Pentax DSLR I had a Canon something or the other. Then I came across an affordable Pentax so with the ability to use my trusty old K & M lenses I bought it complete with the 18-55mm. I took some comparison shots with the two supposedly similar lenses. As you say the Pentax one was fantastic, virtually sharp across the frame whereas the Canon just produced very blurred edges. The comparison image contained some bar-codes at the sides of the frame; the Pentax reproduced the bar-code quite clearly, the Canon's was very blurry and unreadable. I sold the Canon on soon afterwards. Moral of the story - the 18-55 lens is important to keep new buyers on board. Folly to skimp on it.

Comment by JAK posted on DA 18-55 WR at 31/01/2019 - 01:25

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo