JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
Offertonhatter wrote:
... CaNikon users can't really subscribe to small wonderful primes, can they?.....LOL
I'm pretty sure some do using an adapter!

John

Comment by JAK posted on SMC-F 28mm F2.8 at 23/04/2012 - 23:42

JAK
If you printed the whole 100% image full size it would end up as a pretty huge poster. But seen from a normal viewing distance it would look fine.
If you look at posters on hoardings or railway stations close up all you see is lots of dots. Viewing 100% is like trying to view the grain on a film slide or negative; that wouldn't look too good either!

Your full size image looks just fine. I can even see the tulips are about to come out!

John

Comment by JAK posted on Sharpness issue? at 23/04/2012 - 23:24

JAK
Most good photo comps have their T&C checked over by the RPS.

AP used to make a big song and dance about unfair competition T&C's at one time.

John

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax in Comp photo rights grab at 23/04/2012 - 23:12

JAK
But it seems the entries go to Facebook, not PPG.

I cannot view the T&C as I'm not a Facebooker or whatever the users might be called!

John

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax in Comp photo rights grab at 23/04/2012 - 23:08

JAK
fatspider wrote:
Are we really bothered?, winner will probably be a canon user
What will he do with his shiny new K5 then?

John

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax in Comp photo rights grab at 23/04/2012 - 22:42

JAK
johnha wrote:
My advice would be not to do it, offer to document the day informally which will give you greater freedom and allow you to concentrate on being creative.
I'd go along with that. Then the chap who's been handed the Canon 5d instead can risk making a fool of himself when they have to ask you for your informal shots as the Canon ones were NBG.

John

Comment by JAK posted on Wedding dilemma... at 23/04/2012 - 22:41

JAK
Ah well.

If one is supplied with a super £850 camera as a prize then there is some justification in claiming rights to use the photograph without further payment. Passing copyright over is another mater though. If Jo Bloggs enters his shot and it gets nowhere but that gets used by said company, then it looks to be verging on theft, with the company hiding behind its T&C as a get out.

Surprised Pentax wish to put their name to it and get involved. I'm sure there are better ways they can seek publicity.

John

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax in Comp photo rights grab at 23/04/2012 - 22:24

JAK
DaveHolmes wrote:
... exif data (I can't see it now, maybe someone else can?) ...
Camera Model: PENTAX K-x
Image Date: 2012-01-01 00:01:42 (no TZ)
Focal Length: 42.5mm (35mm equivalent: 64mm)
Aperture: f/4.5
Exposure Time: 1.300 s
ISO equiv: 200
Exposure Bias: -1.00 EV
Metering Mode: Spot
Exposure: program (Auto)
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Software: K-x Ver 1.00

Comment by JAK posted on I'm Puzzled at 23/04/2012 - 22:12

JAK
I cannot see any Term and Conditions? Do you have to sign up to facebook for that? If so I'll pass.

Why should a competition like that require one to sign up to a third party website that is nothing to do with either the Cairngorms or Ricoh Pentax?

John

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax in Comp photo rights grab at 23/04/2012 - 22:08

JAK
davidstorm wrote:
... Shoot in RAW, then convert to JPEG before uploading the images to a HDR processing program like Photomatix. ....
Just for info, Photomatix can load in RAW images so no need to convert to JPEG first. It can then save images as 16 bit TIFFs (as well as 8 bit TIFFs and jpeg.)

John

Comment by JAK posted on Shooting in hd at 23/04/2012 - 00:08

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo