JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
Dodge69 wrote:
How many of the 'Wants' are just dreamers and how many will fork out the cash when it comes to the crunch?
What information do you have to suggest it will cost more than a K-5IIs then, or is that just a presumption?

It might easily just replace it in the market position and the K5II(+s) move down to the slot presently occupied by the original K-5.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax Full Frame, Will it ever happen. at 21/05/2013 - 17:15

JAK
Try speaking to Harrow Technical link

They may take on the repair for you or supply the missing parts.

Note the offer of a discount to PU members.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Help finding Pentax 6x7 Parts at 21/05/2013 - 11:23

JAK
Frogherder wrote:
I'm mindful of the longevity of coloured inks/coloured negatives etc, as just about all the photographs I took in the 60's and 70's have suffered colour change/loss.
Should have used Cibachrome! My prints made using that process are still as good as they were 40 years ago, and that is in sunlight.
Regarding modern printer inks, apart from Chromolife (so Canon say) most prints hung in a room that gets the sun are unlikely to last more than a year or two without serious fading / colour loss.
The best way to get a reasonable long life print is to use a dye-sublimation process. There are some reasonably cheap home use dye-sub printers but generally seem to be limited to just 6"x4".

What dinneenp hasn't said is what type of print he has.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Proper way to frame a photo? at 20/05/2013 - 22:15

JAK
The inbuilt flash is often pretty useless; its light often suffers with a shadow caused by the lens! Given the high ISO's obtainable now just how often is a flash a necessity, and with the reduced noise from a sensible FF sensor (probably not 37mp) no doubt even less.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax Full Frame, Will it ever happen. at 20/05/2013 - 17:22

JAK
It certainly is invasive.

Well this one had a wasp!

Comment Image

(Photographed near Bolton in 2009 on a Samsung GX20 with a Vivitar 90mm f2.8 fully manual lens and Sunpak ring flash.)

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Bluebells at 19/05/2013 - 18:28

JAK
A rarity? Really?

Comment by JAK posted on FS: SMC FA50 f/1.7 at 18/05/2013 - 21:56

JAK
Algernon wrote:
It looks like this.... which is basically a weed, but it
does attract a lot of bees.

Comment Image


'
No, that's Balsam! (And it's wasps that go for it, developing the look of a white variety.)

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Bluebells at 18/05/2013 - 21:53

JAK

Comment by JAK posted on How Much!!!!!!! at 18/05/2013 - 21:46

JAK
The current K30 ad on the Pentax states site says:

[quote="pentaximaging.com"]
Thanks to the K-30, for the first time in a long time location doesn’t matter. Whether it’s a sandy day at the beach or a trek into the wet rainforests of Belize, the K-30 is the ideal DSLR camera to capture your memories regardless of your location or the elements you face.[/quote]link

So it should be fine then

It's no good saying the camera's fine on a sandy beach if the lens isn't.
I'd save a copy of that ad - it may come in useful to support a claim if Pentax renege on its meaning and subtly alter the wording.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Sand in mi WR lens at 07/05/2013 - 09:36

JAK
It simulates slide film characteristics.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Reversal Film at 06/05/2013 - 18:52

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo