Bluebells
Posted 18/05/2013 - 12:20
Link
Not a bluebell I'm afraid.
Posted 18/05/2013 - 14:18
Link
It is a bluebell, you can get white bluebells and pirple bluebells.
Pentax K1-ii and MZ6
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Posted 18/05/2013 - 14:25
Link
It's definitely not a bluebell. Bluebells have bell shaped flowers, this looks more like a type of orchid
Cheers
David
Cheers
David
Posted 18/05/2013 - 15:01
Link
Posted 18/05/2013 - 15:36
Link
Yeah I'm with the Orchid, early purple orchid . the tubers were once said to be an aphrodisiac.... have you got a shot of the leaves? They are broad, pale at the base and rounded and darker at the top . Bluebells have a thin pointed leaf .. nice shot though...jeff..
Posted 18/05/2013 - 18:32
Link
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 18/05/2013 - 19:47
Link
I'd say early purple orchid too, though it is hard to be sure without seeing the leaves.
In any case it seems a very soft photo to me.
In any case it seems a very soft photo to me.
Posted 18/05/2013 - 19:57
Link
Okay, brutally honest...
The flower in the front dominates, but is out of focus. The flower behind is less dominant but in focus. Unfortunately this doesn't really work, IMO. The dominant subject should be in focus, or the depth of field should encompass both.
The fact that you took the photo without your eye to the viewfinder (or at least the screen) goes some way to explaining this. You need to be careful where the camera's focusing in a shot like this, and you just can't do that without looking, I'm afraid.
If you really want the shot, bite the bullet and get down on the wet ground. You'd be able to create a better composition that way, too.
I'm down on my knees in all sorts of conditions so much these days that I finally gave in and bought a pair of trousers with protective kneepads. I've come home with mud all over my clothes on a few occasions because of my determination to get a shot. Sometimes the resultant shots weren't even worth it, but then you won't know unless you try. It won't stop me the next time, either.
The flower in the front dominates, but is out of focus. The flower behind is less dominant but in focus. Unfortunately this doesn't really work, IMO. The dominant subject should be in focus, or the depth of field should encompass both.
The fact that you took the photo without your eye to the viewfinder (or at least the screen) goes some way to explaining this. You need to be careful where the camera's focusing in a shot like this, and you just can't do that without looking, I'm afraid.
If you really want the shot, bite the bullet and get down on the wet ground. You'd be able to create a better composition that way, too.
I'm down on my knees in all sorts of conditions so much these days that I finally gave in and bought a pair of trousers with protective kneepads. I've come home with mud all over my clothes on a few occasions because of my determination to get a shot. Sometimes the resultant shots weren't even worth it, but then you won't know unless you try. It won't stop me the next time, either.
My Flickr • Pentax K-5 • K-5 II • Sigma 8-16mm F/4.5-5.6 DC HSM • Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD ASL • SMC Pentax-DA* 50-135mm F/2.8 ED [IF] SDM • SMC Pentax-DA 55-300mm F/4-5.8 ED • SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 ED AL [IF] WR • Vivitar 100mm F/3.5 Macro AF • Metz Mecablitz 58 AF-2
Posted 18/05/2013 - 21:53
Link
Algernon wrote:
It looks like this.... which is basically a weed, but it
does attract a lot of bees.

'
No, that's Balsam! (And it's wasps that go for it, developing the look of a white variety.)It looks like this.... which is basically a weed, but it
does attract a lot of bees.

'
John K
John K
Posted 19/05/2013 - 08:41
Link
JAK wrote:
John K
That's right I'd forgotten the name, but it is bees not waspsAlgernon wrote:
It looks like this.... which is basically a weed, but it
does attract a lot of bees.
No, that's Balsam! (And it's wasps that go for it, developing the look of a white variety.)It looks like this.... which is basically a weed, but it
does attract a lot of bees.
John K
that are attracted to it.... see here link
Some videos with sound here link
Also known as Indian Balsam, Policeman’s helmet,
Jumping Jacks, Nuns, Bee Bums and Poor Man’s Orchid
-
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 19/05/2013 - 14:05
Link
jeffstclair wrote:
Yeah I'm with the Orchid, early purple orchid . the tubers were once said to be an aphrodisiac.... have you got a shot of the leaves? They are broad, pale at the base and rounded and darker at the top . Bluebells have a thin pointed leaf .. nice shot though...jeff..
Sorry, noe shot of the leaves.
Yeah I'm with the Orchid, early purple orchid . the tubers were once said to be an aphrodisiac.... have you got a shot of the leaves? They are broad, pale at the base and rounded and darker at the top . Bluebells have a thin pointed leaf .. nice shot though...jeff..
Pentax K1-ii and MZ6
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Posted 19/05/2013 - 14:21
Link
Posted 19/05/2013 - 18:28
Link
It certainly is invasive.
Well this one had a wasp!

(Photographed near Bolton in 2009 on a Samsung GX20 with a Vivitar 90mm f2.8 fully manual lens and Sunpak ring flash.)
John K
Well this one had a wasp!

(Photographed near Bolton in 2009 on a Samsung GX20 with a Vivitar 90mm f2.8 fully manual lens and Sunpak ring flash.)
John K
John K
Posted 23/05/2013 - 00:54
Link
I agree with Mark's "brutality" In addition to the focus issues, it looks a bit underexposed. The colors are fairly saturated, but there's not much "pop" to it at all. So, even if the focus was accurate it would be rather unappealing regardless.
I also agree about his take on the conditions. If a shot is worth taking (and sharing).....I think you gotta be willing to deal with the elements to get the best shot possible.
I also agree about his take on the conditions. If a shot is worth taking (and sharing).....I think you gotta be willing to deal with the elements to get the best shot possible.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



1185 posts
22 years
Handsacre
Ground was soaking wet, so I held the camera in front of this, pressed the shutter and hoped.
C&C welcome.
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member