JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
Did this get resolved?

Comment by JAK posted on Forum member "robbiec"? at 06/07/2017 - 14:46

JAK
AndyUK wrote:
All,
Many thanks for your comments and suggestions.
I'm going to have a look through and see what can be done.

Thanks

Andy
How are you getting on with that new K-50 body?

Comment by JAK posted on K50 Repair - Trustworthy Quote at 06/07/2017 - 14:41

JAK
A FF K-1 test photo with the Pentax 150-450mm @ 450mm plus 1.4x converter = 630mm (hand held.) The number sign is approx 87 metres way.
Full image
Comment Image


100% crop (actual pixels) clearly showing screw heads holding up the number sign.
Comment Image

Comment by JAK posted on 560mm f5.6 Price up a MASSIVE 60% at 06/07/2017 - 14:16

JAK

Comment by JAK posted on 560mm f5.6 Price up a MASSIVE 60% at 06/07/2017 - 14:02

JAK
1stEverPentax wrote:
I agree Alan...the 150-450 is absolutely made for wildlife and i'd love one for that specific purpose...just can't see that happening any time soon!

Karlo
Have you spotted this: https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/fs--sigma-150-500mm-f5-0--6-3-zoom-lens-5... ?

and this https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/for-sale--pentax-60-250mm-f4-58169 ?

Comment by JAK posted on 560mm f5.6 Price up a MASSIVE 60% at 06/07/2017 - 13:47

JAK
Looks like this: Shaded Broad-bar
Lovely selection of photos of them all.

Comment by JAK posted on More Butterflies than last year at 05/07/2017 - 23:00

JAK
400mm f5.6, they're around: https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/sigma-400mm-f5-6-apo.html
One here on eBay at under £200: Sigma 400mm f5.6 MC AF prime lens for Pentax.

As to the comments regarding the 600mm lens, that was in response to RobL's post. (As I said in my post in response to yours, I wasn't sure then what you were really after.)

A 400mm lens is pretty specialist, there will be times you'd wish the lens wasn't so long! If you have two bodies in use together as some do then that's not so much of an issue.

i'm pretty sure you'd hit the same issues changing systems only with Pentax there's more older lenses available which should work just fine. With other brands, old lenses aren't always compatible with current cameras having mount and firmware issues. You might only find out once you've bought the lens (a possible costly error.) Then even if it proves compatible currently, buy a new body and the problems begin. One can't criticize Pentax for doing that to users.

Comment by JAK posted on 560mm f5.6 Price up a MASSIVE 60% at 05/07/2017 - 21:32

JAK
Great to be able to take all of those in the space of a week. Well done.

Comment by JAK posted on A scarcity of butterflies this year? ... Image heavy at 05/07/2017 - 19:03

JAK
At least it is built with a screw drive.
Actually sounds like a faulty capacitor rather than motor. The motor would either work or it wouldn't. Capacitors can do odd things and it has been suggested that is often the problem with the 16-50's. Is it that the lens works after it has been installed on the body for a while (i.e. after the capacitor has had a chance to recharge itself?)
The fact you can't repeat the problem suggests that once the capacitor has recharged itself all is well with the lens, which would be normal.

Comment by JAK posted on DA* 60-250 F4 (Erratic SDM Issue please read) £350 plus fees & Postage at 05/07/2017 - 18:45

JAK
A 600mm f4 would likely cost circa £10K if Canikon pricing is anything to go by. Pre-orders anyone?
Weight? 4-5Kg. Just pop it in the rucsac when you go hiking!!
(Personally I'd pass on one of those even if I could afford one.)
At least the Pentax 560 f5.6 is only 3Kg !

Comment by JAK posted on 560mm f5.6 Price up a MASSIVE 60% at 05/07/2017 - 18:10

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo