All Forum Comments
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on To switch or not to switch at 18/09/2012 - 10:25
Photokina isn't the only show in town......
And I'm happy that my K-5 hasn't been rendered irrelevant by a new camera....
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on K-3 at 18/09/2012 - 10:17
Same here Mike....
D3 or K-5/K20D - simple choice really.....when it's fast action stuff the D3 is the default camera...otherwise I pick up the Pentax - my kit excelled itself during the Pentax camera...whether it was the K-5 or K20D the images have a sort of va va voom quality which is quite compelling, the Nikon just feels cold....
I'm just looking forward to hearing what faults the 6D and D600 come shipped with.....oh hang on only Pentax have faults don't they?
Grass ain't always greener....
I love the Pentax for what it can do, which actually applies to 90+% of my photography. The K-5 cannot be compared to a D7K or D90, it's a much better camera, and I had to laugh when I saw images of the D600 with it's scene modes....
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Sorry Pentax - Switching to Nikon at 18/09/2012 - 10:12
D3 or K-5/K20D - simple choice really.....when it's fast action stuff the D3 is the default camera...otherwise I pick up the Pentax - my kit excelled itself during the Pentax camera...whether it was the K-5 or K20D the images have a sort of va va voom quality which is quite compelling, the Nikon just feels cold....
I'm just looking forward to hearing what faults the 6D and D600 come shipped with.....oh hang on only Pentax have faults don't they?
Grass ain't always greener....
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Sorry Pentax - Switching to Nikon at 17/09/2012 - 22:26
Our local one has a scheme of getting folk through to 'A' or 'L'
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Licentiateship RPS... Anyone here? at 16/09/2012 - 19:47
As for the FA*600, I could not afford that when it was available, my funds limiting me to a £400 AT-X Tokina 400mm, I used that often until I sold it on here, if it or the 250-600 became readily available again then I would probably swoop.
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on DA 560mm at 13/09/2012 - 14:48
the Caravan Park
nice sets, I go past often - but weather is never on my side
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Valle Crucis Abbey - Llangollen at 13/09/2012 - 10:26
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Johnsons Photopia at 12/09/2012 - 16:28
Womble, in this particular case you are wrong. Should Pentax actually had full lens portfolio then it would be a great addition, but as they lack for so many years in good, long telephoto zoom (something longer and better IQ than anyway great 55-300) and instead of sort this out they add something that probably 1% of Pentax users are going to buy, it just doesn't make a sense.
Myself and as far I know some number of Pentax users would seriously consider 80-400, 100-400 or so lens, that would be comparable to similar offering from Nikon, Canon, Sony. I don't think many of us will seriously consider paying that much for such a lens. Lets get back on the ground, which Pentax users are they trying to please with such a product?, ones that keep talking that all that is needed is manual focus? (they will not buy this lens anyway), those that could considering moving to Pentax, but will not as they don't find lens they may need here?, 1% others that may have this cash to spend?.
If I need a medium telephoto for the Pentax I have the DA55-300 or the DA*60-250, I have the 300 for longer.
The DA*300 is sharper than the equivalent Nikkor (I have both)
The Canon 100-400 and Nikkor 80-400 are both quite old...The advice I was given when looking for the Nikkor was 'Don't bother, get the 70-200 plus TC-E II/III, much better, kerching for Nikon and the dealers...Canon's new 70-300 'L' is over £1K and is f5.6, the Nikkor 70-300 is well regarded, as is the new 28-300 but they are not cheap....Longer means deeper pockets...
I would like the Sigma 100-300 resurrected and a Pentax iteration of the Tokina 80-400 as well....but for the overwhelming majority of my photography my Pentax glass meets my needs - I have no need for any more, 'WANT' is a different matter.
So, before we all think it's the end of the world that there is no K-3 and the DA560 costs the same as a small car, the lemmings going to other brands will find the grass isn't greener on the other side.
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on DA 560mm at 11/09/2012 - 14:18
Makes it a straight choice between the Bigmas in K-mount or Nikkor 600 for that money..
Another factor is portability, if it requires its own 2-wheeled transport then that will be off-putting......
Comment by ilovesaabs posted on DA 560mm at 11/09/2012 - 00:21


Has the world gone MAD?
Anyone coming on here would think that only Pentax has QC problems, I have no experience of Olympus camers but I do like the ethos (but not commercial ethics) of the company - very left field and desirable, and good quality.
Good advice from above, but I'd get just one of the DA* zooms - just depends on your type of photography - the 60-250 is amazing. If you like wider views try the DA 12-24 or the Samsung/Sigma equivalents.