ilovesaabs

Joined: 8th June 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

ilovesaabs
Someone threatening to jump ship and get a Pentax?

Has the world gone MAD?

Anyone coming on here would think that only Pentax has QC problems, I have no experience of Olympus camers but I do like the ethos (but not commercial ethics) of the company - very left field and desirable, and good quality.

Good advice from above, but I'd get just one of the DA* zooms - just depends on your type of photography - the 60-250 is amazing. If you like wider views try the DA 12-24 or the Samsung/Sigma equivalents.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on To switch or not to switch at 18/09/2012 - 10:25

ilovesaabs
To be honest Pentax can't win really. Canikon have come out with new FF cameras that would dominate the publicity machine at Photokina, so it would make sense for Canon and Nikon to get all the glory and Pentax can then come up on the inside lane with the killer blow...that's what I hope. have you noted the A99, very subdued announcement, and anonymous compared with 6D and D600 launches....

Photokina isn't the only show in town......

And I'm happy that my K-5 hasn't been rendered irrelevant by a new camera....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on K-3 at 18/09/2012 - 10:17

ilovesaabs
wzorektom wrote:
ilovesaabs wrote:
Same here Mike....

D3 or K-5/K20D - simple choice really.....when it's fast action stuff the D3 is the default camera...otherwise I pick up the Pentax - my kit excelled itself during the Pentax camera...whether it was the K-5 or K20D the images have a sort of va va voom quality which is quite compelling, the Nikon just feels cold....

I'm just looking forward to hearing what faults the 6D and D600 come shipped with.....oh hang on only Pentax have faults don't they?

Grass ain't always greener....
So the other way is to get the other brand camera for certain purpose like sport photography, fast moving objects or wildlife ?
It's the Nikon's ability to catch moving objects that I like, but I am talking about equipment that costs substantially more than the K-5 and if and when Pentax launch an FF camera the only response will be cries of protest because it's too expensive....

I love the Pentax for what it can do, which actually applies to 90+% of my photography. The K-5 cannot be compared to a D7K or D90, it's a much better camera, and I had to laugh when I saw images of the D600 with it's scene modes....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Sorry Pentax - Switching to Nikon at 18/09/2012 - 10:12

ilovesaabs
Same here Mike....

D3 or K-5/K20D - simple choice really.....when it's fast action stuff the D3 is the default camera...otherwise I pick up the Pentax - my kit excelled itself during the Pentax camera...whether it was the K-5 or K20D the images have a sort of va va voom quality which is quite compelling, the Nikon just feels cold....

I'm just looking forward to hearing what faults the 6D and D600 come shipped with.....oh hang on only Pentax have faults don't they?

Grass ain't always greener....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Sorry Pentax - Switching to Nikon at 17/09/2012 - 22:26

ilovesaabs
Do you belong to a camera club?

Our local one has a scheme of getting folk through to 'A' or 'L'

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Licentiateship RPS... Anyone here? at 16/09/2012 - 19:47

ilovesaabs
very much a specialist item - I would love the 560 mm lens but even at £2000 or above economics is a factor - we all moan about our DA* lenses being £600-1000 pounds but at least they get used frequently...all I hope that it would be available for rental.

As for the FA*600, I could not afford that when it was available, my funds limiting me to a £400 AT-X Tokina 400mm, I used that often until I sold it on here, if it or the 250-600 became readily available again then I would probably swoop.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on DA 560mm at 13/09/2012 - 14:48

ilovesaabs
You've missed the greatest feature Stuey....

the Caravan Park



nice sets, I go past often - but weather is never on my side

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Valle Crucis Abbey - Llangollen at 13/09/2012 - 10:26

ilovesaabs
Slow, but good quality repairs....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Johnsons Photopia at 12/09/2012 - 16:28

ilovesaabs
piotro wrote:
Womble, in this particular case you are wrong. Should Pentax actually had full lens portfolio then it would be a great addition, but as they lack for so many years in good, long telephoto zoom (something longer and better IQ than anyway great 55-300) and instead of sort this out they add something that probably 1% of Pentax users are going to buy, it just doesn't make a sense.
Myself and as far I know some number of Pentax users would seriously consider 80-400, 100-400 or so lens, that would be comparable to similar offering from Nikon, Canon, Sony. I don't think many of us will seriously consider paying that much for such a lens. Lets get back on the ground, which Pentax users are they trying to please with such a product?, ones that keep talking that all that is needed is manual focus? (they will not buy this lens anyway), those that could considering moving to Pentax, but will not as they don't find lens they may need here?, 1% others that may have this cash to spend?.
When you do look at the opposition it makes for sobering reading.

If I need a medium telephoto for the Pentax I have the DA55-300 or the DA*60-250, I have the 300 for longer.

The DA*300 is sharper than the equivalent Nikkor (I have both)

The Canon 100-400 and Nikkor 80-400 are both quite old...The advice I was given when looking for the Nikkor was 'Don't bother, get the 70-200 plus TC-E II/III, much better, kerching for Nikon and the dealers...Canon's new 70-300 'L' is over £1K and is f5.6, the Nikkor 70-300 is well regarded, as is the new 28-300 but they are not cheap....Longer means deeper pockets...

I would like the Sigma 100-300 resurrected and a Pentax iteration of the Tokina 80-400 as well....but for the overwhelming majority of my photography my Pentax glass meets my needs - I have no need for any more, 'WANT' is a different matter.

So, before we all think it's the end of the world that there is no K-3 and the DA560 costs the same as a small car, the lemmings going to other brands will find the grass isn't greener on the other side.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on DA 560mm at 11/09/2012 - 14:18

ilovesaabs
Let's see what happens when SRS get it in stock..........

Makes it a straight choice between the Bigmas in K-mount or Nikkor 600 for that money..

Another factor is portability, if it requires its own 2-wheeled transport then that will be off-putting......

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on DA 560mm at 11/09/2012 - 00:21

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo