All Forum Comments
I can't see any artefacts that the shot itself has introduced to the image?
Comment by i-Berg posted on Long exposure - strange results? at 10/07/2010 - 03:02
These will take longer to load, as each one has to be re-rendered individually on import by LR. The other options use the thumbs generated by the camera itself (they're the ones you would see on the LCD on the camera).
Good thing is though - standard previews are only rendered by LR once.
I've never used anything but standard previews, so I'm not sure if that will make the difference you are looking for. It can't hurt though.
Comment by i-Berg posted on Lightroom 3 - Image differences between Library and Develop at 09/07/2010 - 14:47
Comment by i-Berg posted on Lightroom 3 - Image differences between Library and Develop at 09/07/2010 - 14:29
Comment by i-Berg posted on Spitfire Flypast (3 pics) at 09/07/2010 - 13:02
Comment by i-Berg posted on Spitfire Flypast (3 pics) at 09/07/2010 - 12:29
You may get a better result with a procedure that includes resampling your jpg with a quality algorithm, and then a resharpen.
Comment by i-Berg posted on 30 year old lens - Bokeh - Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5 at 09/07/2010 - 11:46
If not, then I'm with Pink Floyd also.
Comment by i-Berg posted on What's the greatest album cover of all time ? at 09/07/2010 - 11:07
Whether or not you lose IQ on reducing image size to 800 px wide might depend on the way you go about it - which method do you use Algi?
Comment by i-Berg posted on 30 year old lens - Bokeh - Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5 at 09/07/2010 - 10:58
Comment by i-Berg posted on focus problems at 09/07/2010 - 10:53

