All Forum Comments
Comment by Hyram posted on Official links to new kit in English! at 22/09/2008 - 18:07
George Lazarette wrote:
Bloodhound is what I call a boat. Oh for a spare million (and another three or four to run it.)
G
Just under a million is her current price (pounds sterling), quite a bargain as she has had a million spent on her restoration.Bloodhound is what I call a boat. Oh for a spare million (and another three or four to run it.)
G
She is tiller steered, which must be quite interesting on a 63ft racing yacht
Comment by Hyram posted on "Bloodhound" at 19/09/2008 - 19:14
Malo1961 wrote:
Blasphemy
( OK, you have just used your one sin a year quote.)
Martin.
I shall go and hide in a corner in shame Hyram wrote:
Not sure that I should mention that on this forum
A 5mb Ixus
A 5 MB Canon Ixus ::Not sure that I should mention that on this forum
A 5mb Ixus
Blasphemy
( OK, you have just used your one sin a year quote.)
Martin.
Comment by Hyram posted on "Bloodhound" at 19/09/2008 - 08:19
xbow wrote:
Nice Pics, what camera?
Vic.
Not sure that I should mention that on this forum Nice Pics, what camera?
Vic.
A 5mb Ixus
Comment by Hyram posted on "Bloodhound" at 18/09/2008 - 20:43
A couple of shots quickly grabbed on my work P & S camera whilst at a Business Event at the Southampton Boat Show.
[IMG]http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s30/Hyram_Hare/IMG_3348-1.jpg[/IMG]
"Bloodhound" is a very famous yacht, having been built by Camper & Nicholson in 1936.
She was owned by the Royal Family for quite a few years.
[IMG]http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s30/Hyram_Hare/IMG_3352-1.jpg[/IMG]
She is for sale for anyone with quite a few spare pennies
[IMG]http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s30/Hyram_Hare/IMG_3348-1.jpg[/IMG]
"Bloodhound" is a very famous yacht, having been built by Camper & Nicholson in 1936.
She was owned by the Royal Family for quite a few years.
[IMG]http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s30/Hyram_Hare/IMG_3352-1.jpg[/IMG]
She is for sale for anyone with quite a few spare pennies
Comment by Hyram posted on "Bloodhound" at 18/09/2008 - 19:25
mikew wrote:
Isn't the 16-50 bigger and heavier?
Mike
Yes - it is bigger and heavier but you do not notice it when attached to a K10D / K20D.Isn't the 16-50 bigger and heavier?
Mike
Comment by Hyram posted on pentax 16-45mm or sigma EX18-50mm at 16/09/2008 - 20:18
Unlocker wrote:
If you go for it, would wholeheartedly recommend that you get the following 2 lenses
DA* 16-50 2.8
DA* 50-135 2.8
My standard kit is :If you go for it, would wholeheartedly recommend that you get the following 2 lenses
DA* 16-50 2.8
DA* 50-135 2.8
K10D + DA* 16-50 or DA* 50-135
and
K20D + DA* 50-135 or DA* 16-50
Comment by Hyram posted on I would Like To.................. at 16/09/2008 - 18:15
........glowing embers in this one
[IMG]http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s30/Hyram_Hare/IMGP0499-1.jpg[/IMG]
(photograph courtesy of Belinda B.)
[IMG]http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s30/Hyram_Hare/IMGP0499-1.jpg[/IMG]
(photograph courtesy of Belinda B.)
Comment by Hyram posted on Playing with fire... at 16/09/2008 - 08:40
Well Belinda B. has used the most obvious "cute" subject matter that I might have used, so what else is there :
Comment by Hyram posted on Weekly Competition #63 Cute at 16/09/2008 - 08:29
GivingTree wrote:
At first I thought this would be a piece of cake, but turns out it's as challenging as the rest!
Just submit your avatar At first I thought this would be a piece of cake, but turns out it's as challenging as the rest!
Comment by Hyram posted on Weekly Competition #63 Cute at 16/09/2008 - 08:27
For those who haven't seen them yet, official links for the new lens roadmap:-
Roadmap
And also the DA*55 & DA* 60-250
Lenses
The 60-250 must have had the longest gestation period of any lens
Sadly the rear converter seems as far away as ever