All Forum Comments
Comment by Hardgravity posted on fish eye at 23/04/2011 - 20:34
Comment by Hardgravity posted on Another pointless thread at 22/04/2011 - 22:09
Thanks Oggy
Comment by Hardgravity posted on What are they? at 22/04/2011 - 12:23
What are they?
Comment by Hardgravity posted on What are they? at 22/04/2011 - 12:07
Staying with the MX, How about a digital MX, without all the superflous programmes, designed to be light in the hand and simple to use.
After all, how many people use anything other than Av, Tv, M or P on the selection dial?
Comment by Hardgravity posted on Suggestions to Pentax at 22/04/2011 - 10:45
The screens for the MX and LX are different, so the LX one in the MX may not be suitable.
The MX should have a bright viewfinder thanks to its silver coated pentaprism, so if it's dull something is amiss.
I agree that the MX should be bright enough to use inside, all mine are and I get good results without flash.
Comment by Hardgravity posted on Suggestions to Pentax at 22/04/2011 - 10:39
According to my other half that's an understatement, it can actually be bl***y agony.
Still when the kids grow up and leave home the pain stops.
For a bit anyway!
Comment by Hardgravity posted on Another pointless thread at 21/04/2011 - 20:24
Try 'spider Karl, you could be lucky.
Comment by Hardgravity posted on photo workshops in west yorkshire at 19/04/2011 - 13:23
I know Kris has his Horseman and I play with a range of 120 and 127 format folders but has any one else tried similar 'alternatives' to the true way?
Before 'spider says anything, it's not me in the original image either.
Comment by Hardgravity posted on The Old way at 19/04/2011 - 13:21
... but not at this time in the morning.
Comment by Hardgravity posted on Another pointless thread at 19/04/2011 - 08:04
All I'm comming across are the 500 and 800 mirrors.