All Forum Comments
I agree with Colin and Jackie, the third shot to me looks more balanced and natural.
Comment by Greytop posted on Icicles in Durham today at 05/01/2010 - 09:16
Thanks for your comments pnjmcc, the grainy effect happens to be courtesy of the K-7 at ISO 3200
Comment by Greytop posted on Recent break in North Cornwall at 05/01/2010 - 09:06
I agree, I have become more and more selective about TV. I only now tend to watch wildlife, the odd documentary and some sports programs.
On our recent short break in Cornwall my wife and I didn't watch a single program
On our recent short break in Cornwall my wife and I didn't watch a single program
Comment by Greytop posted on YOUR CHOICE ? at 05/01/2010 - 09:01
Likewise
Comment by Greytop posted on Gold Mining Relics... at 04/01/2010 - 22:19
Number two for me. I like the two converging almost crossing structures of the bridge and warehouse. Nice image
Comment by Greytop posted on New York, New York... at 04/01/2010 - 22:08
Thanks Mike and Pete, seems that it might possibly be a better performer than the the 16-50 wide open (at least in the boarders). Centre performance of the 16-50 is still good to excellent at f/2.8 and the whole frame sharpens nicely by around f/4 to f/5 or thereabouts.
I might even consider one these 17-50s if I spot used one at a reasonable price
I might even consider one these 17-50s if I spot used one at a reasonable price
Comment by Greytop posted on Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 XR Di II LD at 04/01/2010 - 19:41
Must admit I thought it looked pretty good as a 1:1 without any sharpening.
Comment by Greytop posted on Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 XR Di II LD at 04/01/2010 - 18:13
Thanks Tim I really appreciate that but please take your time, there is no rush at least as far as I'm concerned
Comment by Greytop posted on Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 XR Di II LD at 04/01/2010 - 16:50
The colour balance looks fine for all the shots on my monitor.