All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Optio S50 at 04/01/2006 - 20:04
Carrying on the DIY theme that's been going on today...
Why not wrap the camera body in a modified freezer wine-cooler? That should do the trick
Matt
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Time Exposures using *istD at 12/01/2006 - 23:41
Get a little digi to try out the lighting with!
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Thyristor Flash with Slave(s) at 04/01/2006 - 00:00
I go to the trouble of DLing a manual to explain how to do this, then find you've beaten me to it!
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Optio 50 - Compensating for artificial light...??? at 03/01/2006 - 22:42
Look at page 67 of the manual to see how to do this. The icon which looks like a light bulb is the one you want.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Optio 50 - Compensating for artificial light...??? at 03/01/2006 - 22:41
in the post above I meant view-cameras, but I can't edit it.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Creating Image galleries for your site. at 10/01/2006 - 21:06
And it's well worth while. Shots that one might once have thrown away become viable. This is especially true of over-exposed images. If you shoot JPEGs, over-exposure is death. If you shoot RAW, you can usually recover much or all of what at first sight seemed completely blown highlights.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on RAW conversion Q's at 02/01/2006 - 23:14
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Q: How to simulate *istDS remote control at 03/01/2006 - 07:54
But thank you for the kind words. I don't suppose I'm quite so popular with Mrs Mac.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on New Year's Resolution at 07/01/2006 - 16:39
I hope to get it on Monday, and will report back. From the pictures I have seen taken with this lens, it looks pretty good, but perhaps not great. It's also a lot of money (compared to the many lenses I have bought on Ebay). Even my 31 Ltd cost less (not much, but still less).
But, this is the price of the digital crop factor. My long lenses are much longer; which is great, but the wides are now narrow. (I know a lot of women who would love to go digital. In fact, looking in the mirror, perhaps I should go digital myself.)
So I've dug deep into the piggy bank, and resolved to buy no more lenses this year. Of course, if either of the two SMCP-FA 200mm lenses come on the market at a good price, I have a dispensation. (It's convenient to be able to grant one's own dispensations.)
Also, I don't count real bargains which one has a duty to take advantage of. After all, who would be so unwise, or ungrateful, as to cock a snook at Fate?
It helps, too, that by "year", I mean the Chinese year. This, incidentally, ends on 28 January 2006.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on New Year's Resolution at 06/01/2006 - 23:48


G