All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax to open new lens factory at 08/02/2006 - 22:29
However, the Pentax FA 1:2.8 20mm is a good lens, and I got mine for about £200. Nowadays they often go for a bit less, but at that time the new wide Pentax lenses hadn't appeared.
To match the AOV of your 24mm (on film), you would have to pay more, or choose Sigma or another independent (my advice: start saving).
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Low cost wide angle solution for ist DL at 07/02/2006 - 22:29
I was suggesting you do the same with your flashgun. Set it to manual, and find the correct aperture to use, either with a flash meter, or by experiment using the DSLR.
To trigger the flash, you can buy little flash triggers which operate when they sense the flash on your camera. If you don't want to use the on-camera flash, tape a bit of white card over it to divert the light away from the subject and towards the flash trigger.
http://tinyurl.com/chuft
Obviously this suits fairly static subjects best, like someone sitting for a portrait. Some movement is OK, provided it is within the circle of light provided by the flash gun, and at a more or less constant distance from the gun (or the exposure will be out).
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on af330ftz/istds/off camera? at 07/02/2006 - 01:18
I fully agree. Nice pic.
No doubt if John enjoys this aspect of the game, that's the route he'll take (buying studio flash).
Meanwhile, in the interests of economy, it's worth pointing out the value of reflectors.
A reflector placed on the other side of the face, so that the flash, the subject, and the reflector form a shallow V, will act as a second (weaker) flash unit, and will fill the shadows on that side. You can use almost anything as a reflector, including white paper, a sheet, and aluminium foil.
And of course, you can use several.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on af330ftz/istds/off camera? at 07/02/2006 - 15:51
It works fine, but you often wish for a longer cable, and the total cost is not inconsiderable.
Since by its nature a set-up using cables is fairly static, you might just as well use a bog-standard remote trigger and manual exposure setting like a normal studio set-up. Cheaper, and, given the problems with digital cameras and flash, probably better.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on af330ftz/istds/off camera? at 07/02/2006 - 00:09
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on UFraw for Gimp/Linux users at 05/02/2006 - 15:58
By all accounts it's pretty good, though. At the time this was made, optical designers had pretty much perfected the design of moderate focal length lenses, and construction standards were very high. They weren't building down to a price in those days before Canon became pre-eminent and dragged down standards.
So there's no reason for it not to be excellent. Enjoy it.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Opinion on Pentax SMC K 30mm f2.8 at 06/02/2006 - 00:07
By 1996, when the 28-70 came out, cheap computing power had revolutionised lens design.
How many samples of the 18-55 have you tried? Most people seem to think it is OK, especially considering the price. But I do concede that the 28-70 was relatively cheap, too, and a very fine performer. Of course, it has a more limited zoom range.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Opinion on Pentax SMC K 30mm f2.8 at 06/02/2006 - 10:24
Zooms, of course, have got much better, thanks to computer power.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Opinion on Pentax SMC K 30mm f2.8 at 06/02/2006 - 09:58
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Opinion on Pentax SMC K 30mm f2.8 at 06/02/2006 - 16:16


It will be opened later this year.
http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/news/2006/200604.html
Very good news, and one in the eye for the idiots who think Pentax is about to shut up shop.
G