George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Mac,

An interesting article:

http://digilander.libero.it/aohc/selart07e.htm

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on image quality between 31mm ltd & DFA 40mm on istD at 21/11/2006 - 23:31

George Lazarette
Quote:
Goerge,

In your recent comparison list twixt Sigma and Pentax lenses, you mentioned pointing them at the sun.

Does this mean that the Pentax coatings reduce flare?
Your humble student,
In a word, yes.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on image quality between 31mm ltd & DFA 40mm on istD at 21/11/2006 - 22:46

George Lazarette
I wouldn't say all Sigma lenses are bad; there are clearly some pretty good ones.

However, I would say that using Pentax lenses gives:

a A guarantee that the lens will work as intended. This is not always true of Sigma lenses on non-Sigma bodies.

b A guarantee of at least a reasonable level of mechanical quality. Sigma lenses can be dire.

c The best lens coating available. Try pointing similar Pentax and Sigma lenses at the sun.

d Consistent colour rendition.

e Consistent operation - focussing rings turn the same way, etc.

f Truly wonderful quality when you buy good Pentax glass (which means all but the common consumer zooms) .

e That smug feeling you get when you know you haven't compromised on quality in order to save a little money.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on image quality between 31mm ltd & DFA 40mm on istD at 21/11/2006 - 20:25

George Lazarette
Quote:
P.S. I don't think George will agree with me on this one!

Dan
Well, you got something right!

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on image quality between 31mm ltd & DFA 40mm on istD at 21/11/2006 - 20:11

George Lazarette
I have only one DA lens, the 12-24mm. I have no complaints with it, but to my eyes it is in no way better than the 31mm Ltd.

The whole business of digitally-enhanced lenses is over-hyped in my view, especially when applied to smaller sensors. Full-frame 35mm may be another matter, but that doesn't concern Pentax users.

The fact that DA lenses are generally pretty good is, I believe, because they are modern designs produced on powerful computers with sophisticated software, not a chap at a desk with a pencil and paper.

George

Comment by George Lazarette posted on image quality between 31mm ltd & DFA 40mm on istD at 11/11/2006 - 05:34

George Lazarette
I've just realised that when Spirit of Will mentioned selliing a 31mm to "young" George, he was referring to me.

I can only say that in all other respects his descriptions have been totally accurate.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on 77mm Limited info at 10/11/2006 - 22:33

George Lazarette
At this rate, the 77 Ltd is going to be the commonest lens around. But so what - it deserves to be.

Enjoy them, chaps.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on I have a gap to fill... at 15/11/2006 - 08:26

George Lazarette
The golden rule is: If in doubt, buy the 77.

Far better quality, and much faster, than the 80-320 zoom.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on I have a gap to fill... at 09/11/2006 - 10:28

George Lazarette
The Super A takes winder ME2, but not winder ME.

It also takes Motor Drive A, which is what you are thinking of. Faster, and scarcer.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on ME Super winding problem at 08/11/2006 - 19:50

George Lazarette
The Super A is really a development of the ME Super, and offers the same plus full AE (program), shutter priority AE, and TTL flash. It uses the same accessories (eg winder, etc), plus a motor-drive.

It has a very simple and easy to use interface. I have had many Pentax bodies, and the Super A is my favourite.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on ME Super winding problem at 08/11/2006 - 19:08

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo