George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Quote:
Here's a pic of DIGITAL PENTAX PETE on a press job in Billercay taken by the Chief Photographer of the Yellow Advertiser newspaper on his NIKON D2X---maybe that's why it's not sharp all over----he should have used a PENTAX !!!!!!!!!
Comment Image

[Open Image] [Hosted by PhotoGalaxy.com]
I make it a rule never to borrow my wife's wig.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on It's DIGITAL Pentax Pete! at 05/06/2007 - 11:22

George Lazarette
Pentax cameras tend to be very forgiving of high flash voltages, and Canon very unforgiving.

So it's safer to put a Canon flash on a Pentax camera than vice-versa.

Put a voltmeter across the terminals of the flash when it is charged. I bet you'll find the voltage is under 10 volts. If so, you should be fine.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Using an old Canon 188A flash with Pentax K100D DSLR? at 18/06/2007 - 18:32

George Lazarette
Quote:
George Lazarette wrote:
I have a Trekker, and I find it a real pain if I want to get somethig out of it whilst on the move.

.....but I am seriously considering a Pentax Crossover instead of my present bag. It sounds ideal for cyclists.
I now have this image of GL in cycling shorts riding along no hands, a K10D in one hand, a rear lens cap between his teeth, attempting to fish another lens out of his bag with the other.

It's not a pretty sight on a Friday night as I try to relax with the weekend coming on...
I confess I'm not a pretty sight at any time!

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 15/06/2007 - 23:50

George Lazarette
Actually, Chris, I was being a little mischievous. I think the Slingshot is great.

I don't actually have a Slingshot, I have a Trekker, and I find it a real pain if I want to get something out of it whilst on the move.

I hate the prices these people charge for something that costs about a pound to make in Zengzhou, but I am seriously considering a Pentax Crossover instead of my present bag. It sounds ideal for cyclists.

Cheers

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 15/06/2007 - 23:18

George Lazarette
You want a cross-over bag at a decent price, preferably one that's waterproof, and that doesn't invite attention from muggers.

And if there is some connection with the manufacturer we know and love, all the better.

You need this:

http://tinyurl.com/3acfwa

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 15/06/2007 - 23:09

George Lazarette
This post has been going on and on, and nobody has answered the original poster's question.

So I shall.

No.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 15/06/2007 - 20:50

George Lazarette
Quote:

Four such lamps, mounted in a large bucket that was used as the reflector. Picture by me, bucket by my ADAPS friend Harry Gladson.
Great picture.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 22:47

George Lazarette
Quote:
George Lazarette wrote:
Quote:


There is an even better range of lighting which I use quite a lot called Kino-Flo Diva Lites (www.kinoflo.com).
They look very much like powerful fluorescent lights to me. Are they not?

G
The tubes come in Tugsten and Dalylight balance and are flicker free, they are also dimmable. I find that using all daylight tubes is too cold and all tungsten too warm so I tend to use three daylight and one tungsten or vice versa. They also have barn doors. They come in a wide range of sizes from 6 inches (ideal for use in cars and indeed they can run off the car cigarette lighter) up to banks of 18 6ft tubes. There is also a white nylon diffuser which gives a really great quality of light.

However, getting back to McBrian's OP, no use at all for stopping motion!

Ken
They are clearly fluorescent lamps, colour-balanced either for daylight or for tungsten, so that in the latter case they can be used to augment ambient interior lighting.

I suspect they are also very expensive, though no doubt very good.

But do you have practical experience of the lamps I referred to, and in what way are they inferior to Kinos (apart from being much cheaper )?

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 20:10

George Lazarette
Quote:


There is an even better range of lighting which I use quite a lot called Kino-Flo Diva Lites (www.kinoflo.com).
They look very much like powerful fluorescent lights to me. Are they not?

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 15:40

George Lazarette
Quote:
gartmore wrote:
Brian, why do you want to sync higher than 180 in a studio? Depending on the flash head in use your effective exposure could well be 1/20000 of a second at f*. Outdoors, of course, is another matter and that's why Pentax have made leaf shutter lenses for the 645 and 67, probably aimed at wedding photographers primarily.

Ken
To freeze movement, or have I got my thinking all wrong?
Yes. Your effective shutter speed (or duration of exposure) is the duration of the flash, which is usually at most 1/1000 second, and often much less.

You will almost never have a problem freezing movement in a studio. The only time it might happen is if you have a lot of ambient light. Solution - switch off the overhead lights, or draw the curtains.

G

PS: There is an alternative to tungsten. Very powerful fluorescent bulbs are now available, colour-balanced to daylight. Unlike tungsten, they run cool(ish), and don't draw much power. They have an American ES fitting. I'm planning to try a couple.

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Studio flash and high speed sync at 06/07/2007 - 10:05

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo