All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Macro photography setups at 26/08/2007 - 18:03
There are actually no arguments in favour of shooting JPEG except file size, unless you have a point and shoot and are happy to do no post-processing.
It's just as quick to process a batch of RAW files in a proper converter as it is to process JPEGs (though you do need to go off and have a coffee while the computer does the conversion).
The paid-for version of Silkypix does batch conversions of all supported RAW files (including all varieties of PEF) and DNG.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Shoot raw and auto convert or stick with Hi-Res JPG at 28/08/2007 - 14:18
one more vote for Raw
if you auto convert your raws you get back to what you would have had if you'd shot JPEG in the first place
If you take some time to get your head around Raw processing you get more options. you can't loose.
And the best RAW converter is probably Silkypix. I don't really do any post-processing to speak of, after the RAW conversion, because Silkypix does everything that I need to do with a whole image (full or cropped).
It won't allow me to work on selected areas of an image, so for that, or for serious image manipulation, I use Picture Window Pro. But I avoid doing so if I can possibly help it.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Shoot raw and auto convert or stick with Hi-Res JPG at 27/08/2007 - 16:47
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Tyr's Insane Macro Day. at 26/08/2007 - 17:10
I go away for a few days, and all hell breaks out.
Apparently, people were being rude to each other.
Don't they know that's my job?
Bah!
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Im almost off and away..RANT! at 26/08/2007 - 17:42
I would like to see people mention the camera and lens, and perhaps the exposure details too.
G
Just my 2 cents
Regards
Drew
PS: Here's a great quote I made note of a few weeks ago:
A great photograph is one which shows us what we saw (or would have seen had we been there), but didn't notice. The photographer, or artist in the medium of photography, saw something that the ordinary person might see, but wouldn't SEE, without the insight and imagination of the artist. -G
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Weekly Competition No 8 - "Reflection" at 04/09/2007 - 11:10
For me when it comes to a good photographic image the equipment details are as important as the brand of paint or brush used by the artist in a great painting. In my opinion it is all about the message and if the artist conveyed it to me.
You can bet that when Leonardo and Michelangelo met, they discussed tools and techniques, paints and paintbrushes.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Weekly Competition No 8 - "Reflection" at 04/09/2007 - 09:24
And congratulations, Lilly. There were some very good pictures here, so winning is quite an accolade.
This competition is proving to be a great success. I think the absence of lots of rules is good, though personally I would like to see people mention the camera and lens, and perhaps the exposure details too.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Weekly Competition No 8 - "Reflection" at 04/09/2007 - 00:32
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Weekly Competition No 8 - "Reflection" at 27/08/2007 - 23:10
They are superb. Divine. Scrumptious. Especially the souffle.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Harvest! at 26/08/2007 - 23:21



G