All Forum Comments
Comment by fatspider posted on DON'T BUY PENTAX DIGITAL LENSES!!! at 12/12/2006 - 19:54
Seriously now teogin, Pentax have dont their best to maintain the K mount and keep it as adaptable as they can without compromising features on later models, can the same be said for other brands?, As for flash, perhaps Pentax realised that buyers WANTED more advanced flashguns for thier newer bodies and sales figures reflected this, why go to the expense of making a modern DSLR TTL flash compatable if the majority of its buyers will want PTTL.
As for reduced circle lenses you can apply the same argument, but hey, if you dont like them then Pentax still produce "35mm" alternatives.
Comment by fatspider posted on DON'T BUY PENTAX DIGITAL LENSES!!! at 12/12/2006 - 12:00
I tried copying slides with my 35mm Ohnar and my istD, I couldnt get all the slide in because of the increase in focal length!
Comment by fatspider posted on Transparency copying with DSLR(positives and negatives) at 13/12/2006 - 22:57
Comment by fatspider posted on Jessops TP327 Tripod - Is it any good ?... at 13/12/2006 - 22:54
Comment by fatspider posted on Jessops TP327 Tripod - Is it any good ?... at 13/12/2006 - 17:31
Apart from the translation that was a very interesting article.
thanks
Comment by fatspider posted on Pentax thinking on K10D at 11/12/2006 - 22:18
Having just got into shooting birds I intended to buy a Sigma 135-400 with my K10D but then after reading posts and praise of the 50-500 "bigma" considered it would be a much better option, then after seeing the price narrowed it down to the 175-500 (I would only use the long end anyway),
Question is, do I wait for the possible HSMs and either buy that or a discounted non HSM lens?
Comment by fatspider posted on Decisions Decisions at 10/12/2006 - 16:00
Comment by fatspider posted on White Balance at 10/12/2006 - 15:37
I just got back from a few days in Prague, the weather was overcast on a couple of days and nice blue skies the rest of the time, problem was my istD was shooting with an undesireable blue cast, my wifes Minolta Dimage was turning out reasonable stuff and I thought my istD had thrown a wobbly, I checked the saturation settings etc, tried it in different modes, but the blue cast was still there, I decided to continue shooting (blue pics are better than none)
On the last day I tried some flash shots in the hotel, they were equally as blue, I was just about to resign to the fact my camera needed some expert attention when it dawned on me what the problem was, dont know how its happened but my white balance setting had been changed from auto to tungsten, why I never thought of this is anybodys guess, I felt such an idiot.....
So, does anyone have a quick fix method of adjusting the colour balance in photoshop, preferably something I can apply as a batch filter to every image. the images were all shot at the highest quality jpeg setting,
My MZ5n also had a fit, but thats another post......
Comment by fatspider posted on White Balance at 10/12/2006 - 00:29
I'm still laughing.
Comment by fatspider posted on OT, Rye Scottish humour at 12/12/2006 - 20:00


At the end of the day all it comes down to is Pentax will continue to make bodies and lenses that are not totally backward (or forward) compatable, for example the first autofocus lenses for the ME-F, plus the crippled mount on the MZ30 (I think it was MZ30) that wouldn't function at all with K mount lenses, and lets not forget the varying number of shutter release cables, remote controls, battery grips etc etc etc.
I for one will not be put off buying the K10D just because my AA batteries or compact flash cards wont fit, (I may be p!$$£d off about it but it wont stop me buying it)