All Forum Comments
Comment by Father Ted posted on No 10 - Road Tax Petition at 27/05/2008 - 15:59
Mention was made of real people. I reckon I'm pretty real and I drive a Discovery for towing and have a Land Rover for fun. I can run either on cooking oil if I want to so it seems a bit harsh to tax me into oblivion.
That's the trouble with blabket reactions they apply to everyone fair or not.
I had a Range Rover 3.5 litre but I ran that on LPG which is a waste product of some process or other.
I reckon with one vehicle at 12 years old and the other at 23 years old I'm a darned sight greener than anyone who buys any new car chock full of plastic and batteries.
Mike
The alternative for not using this on the shorter journeys is to have two cars...now how would that help?
I also run my car on waste vegetable oil during the summer, ( can't make it work int the winter..yet). As this oil was destined for landfill, I reckon the government should pay me, for (a) saving waste from landfill and (b) not using diesel.
"Taxed into oblivion"? Now what would I do then? I'd end up not being able to tow, so flying away on holiday and increasing my carbon output.
As Mike says. The government's argument is too simplistic. Remove the VED and put the tax onto fuel. But do it fairly. I only do about 5000 miles a year, and most of that in the summer, so I use less fossil fuel than my friends with their "efficient" modern cars, why should I be penalised just because the engine is bigger?
Comment by Father Ted posted on No 10 - Road Tax Petition at 27/05/2008 - 11:44
That is...simply...delicious!
Anybody got a bottle of Chilean Merlot to go with that?
javascript:emoticon('')
Nice shot, though!
Comment by Father Ted posted on A Bovine Audience at 22/05/2008 - 12:26
One of the reasons certain threads become so inflamed (far more so than this one, I might suggest)
We've had open war a couple of times, lasting for months, culminating in stolen databases, multiple bannings and threats of police action.
They were the fun times
Did get people posting, though. Our highest "Users Online" count was during that time.
Comment by Father Ted posted on A (somewhat rhetorical) ethical question. at 22/05/2008 - 22:40
, if that person should gives as much as he takes. .
But, that's just my opinion.
Comment by Father Ted posted on A (somewhat rhetorical) ethical question. at 21/05/2008 - 22:28
I really like this though; makes me think of an alligator watching his prey.
And well spotted.
Comment by Father Ted posted on "The eyes" at 19/05/2008 - 20:58
I must admit, I don't hold much hope of winning these competitions ( well, not in the near future ), but I do enjoy entering as it forces me to think about what I shoot and take on board tips like this.
Now to find a seaside shot. I think it'd be cheating to bring out my "Blue" entry
Comment by Father Ted posted on Weekly Competition No. 46: Public Transport at 27/05/2008 - 13:48
Father Ted: Ferry cross the Mersey:
This picture could have been great if......, you had shot from a higher viewpoint, so the ship would have been loose from the horizon. And it could use an overall contrast and color boost. Now it looks to flat for my taste.But as you said, you didn,t have the time for some work on the picture. To bad, it deserved it.
.
When you say, "you had shot from a higher viewpoint, so the ship would have been loose from the horizon.", what do you mean by "loose from the horizon"?
Oh...and Congrats to John. I really liked that photo too!
Comment by Father Ted posted on Weekly Competition No. 46: Public Transport at 27/05/2008 - 10:26
"Ferry 'cross the Mersey"

Straight as it came off the camera, I haven't had time to make any alterations.
Comment by Father Ted posted on Weekly Competition No. 46: Public Transport at 20/05/2008 - 22:56
Comment by Father Ted posted on Our wwbsite at 19/05/2008 - 21:08


Incidentally I'm no longer convinced bio fuels are a good thing seeing the way the cost of cooking oil has gone up. I can afford it but the third world can't. So I'm back on diesel.
Mike