All Forum Comments
Comment by Father Ted posted on OFF Topic.......Topic at 20/01/2009 - 11:29
Back on topic..or should that be off topic...
The sun just came out!!!!! ( Shame I'm in work )
Oh..and it is 3 ducks
Comment by Father Ted posted on OFF Topic.......Topic at 20/01/2009 - 10:11
It's all quite clear and is followed up by PM where necessary. It must be quite clear because every judge so far has done what was expected.
From the first competition I entered it was clear to me that the judge had to give considered c&c.
So anyone who is vaguely regular on this site would be aware of this convention, even if it is not written down.
( That's why I was made up with my 2nd place, most of the kudos, but I didn't have to judge )
Comment by Father Ted posted on Weekly Competition # 80 - Nearness at 20/01/2009 - 10:06
Latest update - It seems that the price has gone up since I bought the camera.
They now expect me to pay the increased difference.
If they have CCTV ask them for a copy of you buying the camera, they can't legally refuse ( if they still have the recording). That is your proof of purchase, then go direct to Pentax for your warranty.
Well, that's what I'd try.
Comment by Father Ted posted on Does anyone know where I stand? at 19/01/2009 - 20:45
I just wanted to take photographs which accurately represented what I saw, in a manner which others would want to see.
I too come from a "non-artistic" background and have really struggled with trying to get arty. But, what I've found is that when I try to push myself to be a bit more arty, then others are more likely to like what I've done.
So, in short: I am trying to faithfully reproduce something in an artistic manner.
Comment by Father Ted posted on Why take a photogaph? at 19/01/2009 - 20:39
Interesting one this. Let's have a look at it from the other way round. You are a dealer and you have two cameras, a Leica at £4000 and a silmilar Voigtlander at £400 - in error you charge correctly for the £400 one on your invoice but supply the wrong goods and actually send the £4000 camera.
The buyer then contacts you and wants you to credit the original invoice and send a corrected one, but still only charging £400.00
Does it feel right? Or would you want to say sorry, I'll exchange the goods for the right ones or you can keep the wrong ones and pay the balance?
This is usually so a customer can't say they've been given change from, say £10 but they handed over £20.
But, to my mind it is the same here. The shop made the mistake, entered into a contract, even though you pointed the error out. They must bear responsibility.
Had you'd gone back a week or so later and said you'd been given the wrong change would you have got your money back...I think not.
Comment by Father Ted posted on Does anyone know where I stand? at 19/01/2009 - 12:47
That came with the kit lens and was the cheapest I'd seen for a couple of months ( I hung on until I saw on for the right price ).
Comment by Father Ted posted on How much to sell my Pentax *ist for? at 14/01/2009 - 18:35
But what a tough job you must have had this week John.
Congratulations to Uffes.
Comment by Father Ted posted on Weekly Competition #79 One Hundred Yards from Home at 12/01/2009 - 12:45
Comment by Father Ted posted on Abstract structures at 09/01/2009 - 20:47
Comment by Father Ted posted on Frozen Snowdonia at 09/01/2009 - 20:45


Sun out here and shame I'm not working
Still, I would be working if there was any work to do