All Forum Comments
Comment by Father Ted posted on Bump? at 12/04/2010 - 21:31
Comment by Father Ted posted on I'm getting old. at 11/04/2010 - 20:27
can't you adapt a car battery?
Comment by Father Ted posted on Planetary photography at 10/04/2010 - 17:21
And the one new thing..keep my batteries charged
Comment by Father Ted posted on Planetary photography at 09/04/2010 - 18:50
It's bloody hard to photograph Saturn!!!
I spent a couple of hours, took loads of photos and deleted them all.
Still, lessons learnt for next time
Comment by Father Ted posted on Planetary photography at 09/04/2010 - 18:25
I like that one.
Comment by Father Ted posted on Steam special images at 09/04/2010 - 18:23
As Stephen says, let's see some of your pics
Comment by Father Ted posted on hello from Dublin at 09/04/2010 - 16:52
The Cloudspotter's Guide (forgotten the author) is an excellent, and entertaining, place to begin.
It is a good book that. I have a copy of it somewhere.
In the UK, fog is mostly Autumn, Lightning mostly summer,
sunsets at dusk and rain all year
Comment by Father Ted posted on weather for photographers at 09/04/2010 - 16:50
It might be that the objective lens needs to be one of a series? For eg a magnifying glass on its own, as an individual lens, perhaps wouldn't qualify.
I had a rummage round on the internet and couldn't find reference to a subjective lens ( I definitely remember hearing the phrase in school ), but the rear "glass" in a camera type lens was referred to as the "projection" lens, presumably as this is the lens which projects the focused image onto the film/sensor.
Comment by Father Ted posted on Objective? at 09/04/2010 - 08:36
However if we talk about models we talk about subjects so can't we call the objective a subjective then?
The objective of the shot is the subject. The light passing from the subject, passes through the objective onto the sensor.
My brain hurts!!
Comment by Father Ted posted on Objective? at 08/04/2010 - 22:42

