All Forum Comments
Comment by davidtrout posted on Blue Tit K3 v K5 at 09/11/2013 - 16:43
Comment by davidtrout posted on Farewell folks at 09/11/2013 - 16:33
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by davidtrout posted on Hot shoeing at 07/11/2013 - 23:07
560mm f/5.6 seems like a long lens to me, and conveniently compact with its smaller maximum aperture.
I've got a 200mm f/5.6 Takumar here that shows how much more compact lenses can be with more modest apertures.
Horses for courses then. Pentax is superb for most photographic situations but certain top class sporting events need specialist equipment costing £1000s, just as some scientific applications do.
It would be preposterous to expect an amateur photographer to buy expensive gear way beyond his requirements. And lets face it amateur photographers are not going to get close to the touchline at a Premiership match.
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by davidtrout posted on Are Pentax really that bad for sport ? at 07/11/2013 - 10:42
That looks a stunning image...
David
Comment by davidtrout posted on K5 performance at 06/11/2013 - 23:24
quite a lot and that might help although I'm not entirely sure what it does.
Perhaps David Storm's suggestion for warming up the in-camera WB might help you with the K5 Andrew. You shoot RAW and get some amazing pictures so there can't be much wrong with your K5. I know your K10 shots, particularly the black and whites, are superb.
David
PS In my pioneer days with digital photography (I was late in coming from film to the new technology) I progressed from the Ist Ds to the then brand new K10 and was disappointed at the increased noise and duller colours it produced, until I got used to the K10 and changed my approach to PS processing.
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by davidtrout posted on K5 performance at 06/11/2013 - 22:16
I'm not surprised. Despite all the praise for the camera, I always find images from mine to be very flat, two dimensional, lifeless and "digital". There's obviously lots of detail, excellent low light performance and a wonderfully wide dynamic range. And yet...
Afetr a couple of weeks abroad with the K5, I can't wait to get back home to my elderly K10 which, for me at least, produces images of a very different quality.
I'm sure the fault lies with me and the way I use and set up the camera, as others seem to do very well with it, as I am sure will you, when you get used to it.
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by davidtrout posted on K5 performance at 06/11/2013 - 17:29
David
PPG:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by davidtrout posted on Whitby Gothic Weeknd at 05/11/2013 - 22:25
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by davidtrout posted on Whitby Goth Nov 2013 at 05/11/2013 - 22:21
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by davidtrout posted on Whitby Gothic Weeknd at 05/11/2013 - 19:56


David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout