All Forum Comments
Comment by davidstorm posted on Focus Issues with 55-300mm and Circular Polariser at 04/09/2011 - 22:57
Because it loses two or three stops of light, the maximum aperture of the lens at longer focal lengths no longer enables the use of AF.
I'm not sure why you feel the need for a polariser on such a long lens?
It's not the autofocus that isn't working. The autofocus still operates fine. The issue is that whether focussing is manual or auto, you cannot get an image that is sharp. All images are blurred, whether they are in critical focus or not. The polariser is having some sort of combined effect with the lens to produce this issue. The filter in itself is clear as a bell and works on other lenses.
With regard to the need for a polariser on this lens, I intend to use it sparingly, but I do sometimes take landscape shots with the 55-300mm and it would help to ensure the saturation in the skies is good and to empahsise cloud structures.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Focus Issues with 55-300mm and Circular Polariser at 04/09/2011 - 22:33
Good luck with the Ansmann batteries. Ansmann 2200's were the worst batteries I ever bought Wouldn't even work in a Pentax *istDS and useless at holding a charge for very long.
You can't beat Eneloops.
Most chargers won't overcharge AA's so I'd give them 12/24 hours.
It would be worth you buying a Technoline BL-700 Intelligent
AA-AAA battery charger £30 delivered. It will discharge and test
the batteries individually. From Amazon link
Comment by davidstorm posted on Adaptor and AA cells for Pentax Kr are they worth getting. at 04/09/2011 - 12:53
I'm sure others have experienced the issues I am having at present. I often use polarisers, but have only recently bought a 58mm for my DA L 55-300mm. I have found it useless as the lens focus is so soft with the filter fitted that the pictures are not worth keeping. This worsens the longer the focal length gets. I've tried the filter on shorter lenses and it seems fine. I've also confirmed it is a circular polariser and not a linear one by dong the 'eye and mirror' test. The filter itself looks perfect when viewed with the naked eye (no blurring) it is only when on the 55-300 that issues occur.
Doe anyone have any suggestions for a reasonably priced circular polariser for the 55-300mm that works well without the focus issue?
Thanks in advance
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Focus Issues with 55-300mm and Circular Polariser at 04/09/2011 - 11:29
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on AF button or shutter button, AF-C, AF-S at 01/09/2011 - 22:41
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Technical Question about using older lenses at 01/09/2011 - 22:34
I have the 28mm f3.5 Pentax-M and it is a great little lens. I don't have the 50mm f1.7 but I've read good things. Most Pentax lenses are really good.
Your comments on how to set the shutter / aperture are correct, but also as mentioned earlier, you can get the camera to set your shutter speed by pressing the +/- Exposure Compensation button (then adjusting it from there with the thumbwheel if you wish).
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Technical Question about using older lenses at 01/09/2011 - 22:05
Regards
David
PS - what makes you think the image quality of your 28mm is 'pretty shocking'?
Comment by davidstorm posted on Hey all, newbie from stafford :) at 01/09/2011 - 21:19
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Technical Question about using older lenses at 01/09/2011 - 21:14
Hehe,
Yea but that pic is edited a fair bit ... I better not post the one straight from the camera
Actualy I forgot to check. For the gallery, is that meant to be for pic's uploaded unprocessed? Or is it not that strict?
Most of the photos uploaded are 'edited a fair bit'. There's no reason for this to be seen negatively and there are no rules about this. Take a look at the portfolio of Morpheus71 - if processing were not allowed we would be robbed of images like these!
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Hey all, newbie from stafford :) at 01/09/2011 - 20:53


link
Regards
David