All Forum Comments
Comment by davex posted on Post something similar at 10/10/2010 - 04:21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
The last one could be sharper, but it was taken through glass.
C&C welcome, particularly on composition.
Davex.
Comment by davex posted on Chester Zoo big cats (8 images) at 10/10/2010 - 04:09
what could I expect for an "as new" version - any ideas?
Here, £250 ish, probably not £300 but then no fees.
Davex.
Comment by davex posted on SMC Pentax-F 1.7X AF Reasonable Price at 08/10/2010 - 19:25
Or worse yet, a goatse link (warning for the faint of heart, do NOT google it unless you are prepared to be quite possibly scarred for life)
Davex.
Comment by davex posted on Great Photographs at 08/10/2010 - 17:25
Comment by davex posted on Post something similar at 08/10/2010 - 15:00
Comment by davex posted on Please explain macro lenses too me ! at 01/10/2010 - 09:32
Davex.
Comment by davex posted on Please explain macro lenses too me ! at 01/10/2010 - 09:22
Dave.
Comment by davex posted on Photax 135mm f2.8 M42 with K mount adapter (enables infinity focus) at 30/09/2010 - 21:59
No they are not mixed up . (I hope ).
The 12-24 is a good lens, but cannot compare it to yours, have never used it. If you venture near chester give me a nod and well do a head to head.
Davex.
Comment by davex posted on sigma 10-20mm field test (image heavy) at 27/09/2010 - 19:07
Was the darker 12mm due to white balance:
In any case it does show the quality of the lens, 10mm does seem a tad soft, but quite acceptable. An interesting test. Now, if you send it to me I will comparwe it against my samsung 12-24 :
Davex.
Comment by davex posted on sigma 10-20mm field test (image heavy) at 27/09/2010 - 17:49
