Dave-L

Joined: 5th October 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Dave-L
Smeggypants wrote:
There's an audio level meter on the rear display. see here

Thank]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0czEHRCsIU
Thank goodness for that, I'd only seen a still shot of that screen and thought it might have been a fixed volume level adjuster, doh! The video shows it as a real-time levels meter.

Comment by Dave-L posted on Officially K-3? at 08/10/2013 - 19:22

Dave-L
McGregNi wrote:
Its clearly going to be one of the best crop sensor cameras you can buy. There's plenty of interesting new details to pore over. The h.264 video is new I think? Does this mean full hd in a new file format? Am I right that .AVI is more compressed? If so then I guess the bigger files from this k-3 will challenge some users computers. The new recording volume control is a big plus ... I suppose you can monitor it live on the headphones, but I wonder if there's any visual indicator of the level?
MJPEG .avi is less compressed than h.264 .mov so video files will be much smaller (probably at least 4 times smaller than K-5 files). Hopefully they won't overdo the compression though as this could lower video quality - anything less than 20Mbps in full HD could be a cause for concern (depending on the exact profile they use). h.264 compression needs much heavier video chip processing than MJPEG so overheating will still be a definite risk and I await some independent tests of that.

That's a good question about volume level indication and I can't find any mention of it in the specs. Frankly, volume level control is not going to be of much use unless you can monitor the levels visually!

Apart from that, and the extra weight, the K-3 looks good but I'll wait until the body prices fall well below £1,000 before taking the plunge, and by then we should know everything we need to know about its photo quality, video and everything else!

One thing I particularly like is the video time-lapse mode, up to 4K video at 2s to 1h intervals for up to 99 hours! It's unclear though if the 99 hours will apply to very short intervals such as 2 seconds - though the specs don't say it won't.

Comment by Dave-L posted on Officially K-3? at 08/10/2013 - 19:09

Dave-L
stub wrote:
The 55 - 300 Dal if far and away a better buy. Better value with the same image quality. I ugraded mine to the DA lens two years ago. Wished I hadnt. Wasted the money. The lens mount on the Dal, though plastic is substancial. I have never used quick shift once. Other than to find out how it works.
Quick Shift on the 55-300 has saved my bacon more than once when trying to shoot quickly out through window glass (especially the leaded variety!) in dull conditions, and near bushes with e.g. twigs in the foreground. If it starts doing its annoying long-hunting thing, I grab the quick shift collar to correct, then it usually re-focuses quickly where I want it. If not I just flick the manual focus lever.

So in certain conditions it can as I said save your bacon - garden birds etc. tend to disappear before I've had chance to open windows or let it hunt. And I too love this lens, thhough I cannot compare it with the Sigma or Tamron.

Comment by Dave-L posted on Pentax smc DA 55-300mm v Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG OS at 21/02/2013 - 19:51

Dave-L
Dave-L wrote:
Hmmm 40mm F2.8XS £149 unboxed, temptation... temptation...
Well I bit.

K-5 + lens will fit in my anorak pocket now, I'll call it the K-5 P&S (point & shoot) or maybe the K-5C (candid).

Comment by Dave-L posted on Lens Prices November 2012 at 15/11/2012 - 16:20

Dave-L
Hmmm 40mm F2.8XS £149 unboxed, temptation... temptation...

Comment by Dave-L posted on Lens Prices November 2012 at 15/11/2012 - 03:28

Dave-L
johnriley wrote:
To be fair Dave, the 100mm Macro wasn't the right lens for that job, a standard zoom would have been better.

I haven't had any problems with the K-5 in low light. If i can see to manual focus the K-5 can autofocus. The K-5 can be more accurate than me as well in those low light conditions. The K-5 II may well be better again, but that's just a bonus.
'Twas all I had at the time though, apart from a 55-300 which would have been around F4.5 at the 100mm I needed from where I was, can't see how using that would have helped much. Sometimes you just have the wrong lens and then the more camera flexibility the better. It was pretty dark there.

No more cameras for me until this time next year though and by then, who knows what might be available!

Comment by Dave-L posted on Positive K-5iis review at 15/11/2012 - 00:56

Dave-L
McGregNi wrote:
Smeggypants wrote:

Nothing in these K-5II or K-5IIs to make me upgrade my K-5MkIs either.
Not even the '-3ev' AF functioning? That's practically moonlight isn't it?
Now that is exactly what makes it *interesting* to me.

Recently on Hallowe'en I tried to take available light photos of my grand kids by streetlight at one of their neighbour's front door, using a K-5 and my 100mm F2.8 at something like ISO 6400. The darned thing wouldn't focus properly - the street lamps were just a bit too far away and by the time I'd switched to manual everything, I'd missed the best shots.

K-5 II would have nailed it, I wish I'd had it. Yes the 50mm F1.4M might have have nailed it too if I had it with me (was a bit too far away though really) but you can't cart around every lens you have 'just in case' so the more the body can do, the better!

Comment by Dave-L posted on Positive K-5iis review at 13/11/2012 - 04:40

Dave-L
Yes, Virgin Media, and the upload speed on their 100Mbps service is 5Mbps, it may be increased eventually to 10Mbps but either way it's way faster then ADSL broadband upload speeds! Best though for Youtube uploads is BT fibre to the cabinet e.g. Infinity - I have just uploaded an HD file at 18Mbps using BT Infinity 2; it's 8 - 9Mbps on ordinary Infinity.

Comment by Dave-L posted on K30 price drop and cashback at 07/11/2012 - 21:22

Dave-L
MrCynical wrote:
Veering towards the K30 again, because it turns out that MJPEG is what I thought: file sizes 500Mb per minute at 1080p . I mean I know card space is cheap but uploading that to Youtube ain't gonna be much fun.

Summary: someone please send a horse's head to whoever at Pentax decided not to bother putting a ten quid h264 encoder into the K5 II
They may have left K-5II as mjpeg because the .h264 results as in K-30 would currently be of lower quality.

With K-5, just use the free Handbrake program to re-encode it to h.264/.mp4 at one tenth the size (for BBC/ITV HD quality). With my 4 core Athlon 965 and Windows 8 (7 will be similar) it takes just over 3 minutes to convert a minute of Pentax mjpeg as 1080p HD. And as you have almost infiniite quality/bitrate options in Handbrake, you will probably be able to do better than relying on any in-camera h.264 engine, in spite of the re-encode. I think of Pentax mjpeg as 'video RAW'.

Oh, and if you can, get BT Infinity or a fast VM connection for amazingly rapid uploads to Youtube!

Comment by Dave-L posted on K30 price drop and cashback at 07/11/2012 - 16:33

Dave-L
Just thought I'd add to this interesting thread (as I can't find a more relevant recent one) that I lost my K-5 battery charger and had to quickly find a replacement locally, so I tried the Jessops 2 terminal universal charger at £19 (£6 online discount with store pickup) and it appears to work well. Charging is slow, about 6 hours - but it has saved my bacon!

Comment by Dave-L posted on How long will your battery last. at 01/10/2012 - 01:54

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo