darkskies

Joined: 23rd December 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

darkskies
You have to buy it 2nd hand. I recently bought one on here off mannesty, so have a look at that thread.

link

I don't know how fast it is compared to the Siggy, but Mike-P probably does. But, like I say, if you give it a bit of help it makes a big difference.

Comment by darkskies posted on AFRAID TO SAY IT! at 13/02/2013 - 20:21

darkskies
Here's one I took this morning with the combination on a K-r, ISO 400, f9, 1/500s. Cropped to 2200px long side.

Comment Image

Comment by darkskies posted on AFRAID TO SAY IT! at 13/02/2013 - 17:26

darkskies
QuestionableCarrot wrote:
so is the auto focus good on the k5 ii then? I think i read somewhere someone saying that you CAN auto focus with the da 300 and the converter. i didn't think you could
I have the DA*300 and the Pentax x1.7 AF Adapter. Both fairly recently acquired. AF works pretty well. Now I've got used to them. It really speeds things up and stops the hunting if you give the combination a bit of a helping hand. If you focus fairly closely but on the far side of your object then AF will work quite quickly. It's all about learning the pros and cons of your lenses and working with them.

Yes, I know, live objects can move quickly, but stuey has given good examples of why AF isn't strictly necessary, but nice to have.

Comment by darkskies posted on AFRAID TO SAY IT! at 13/02/2013 - 17:06

darkskies
QuestionableCarrot wrote:
apologies i meant to say earlier that the DA 300 isn't an option because the teleconverter removes auto focus.
No, it doesn't.

Comment by darkskies posted on AFRAID TO SAY IT! at 13/02/2013 - 10:50

darkskies
QuestionableCarrot wrote:
The DA* 300 is too short and the converter is leaves to autofocus.
Hi QC,

I understand the 1st part of that sentence but not the last part. Could you explain what you mean?

Comment by darkskies posted on AFRAID TO SAY IT! at 13/02/2013 - 09:52

darkskies
Congratulations, geordie!

Saw your photo on Tyne Tees News this evening!!

Comment by darkskies posted on Dinner time at Blyth beach at 07/02/2013 - 19:08

darkskies
I'm rather with you on this one, David.

I had a DA17-70 which I bought as an upgrade to the kit lens. Then I bought a K28 f3.5 and, apart from the very wide end at which the 17-70 isn't brilliant, imho) I used the 28 and had an M50 and SuperTak 55 for the longer end. The 17-70 became hardly used.

I've now got a Sigma 10-20 for ultra wide, but my lens of choice is the K28, it's resolution on things like trees just blows the 17=70 apart...again, imho. It also has that lusive 3D quality which these old lenses have sometimes. So now I have a K55 as well, that's all sorted.

I don't value the "convenience" of autofocus above the image quality I can get with the K's. In fact, I reckon I take my time more with a manual lens and enjoy it more, but that may be just me.

And, very importantly, I sold my 17-70, which paid for the 28, the 55, and half the 10-20!!

Like Dr O said, I could easily use the K series, plus the DA*300, and plus my DFA 100. Er, which is almost what I'm doing!

Comment by darkskies posted on Old Lenses - Better Images? at 01/02/2013 - 10:00

darkskies
Good choice!

Comment by darkskies posted on DA*300mm V DA*60-250mm at 31/01/2013 - 21:51

darkskies
Buy the DA*300mm and the Pentax AF x1.7 adapter. Then you have a 510mm f6.7.

Just a thought.

Comment by darkskies posted on DA*300mm V DA*60-250mm at 31/01/2013 - 20:20

darkskies
Algernon wrote:
It winds the lens in from infinity... So set it beyond
your subject before you press focus and it shouldn't have
too far to move. If it misses it winds down to minimum
focus and then back out again.
That really does work well.

Comment by darkskies posted on new 55-300mm a bit sluggish at 29/01/2013 - 16:43

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo