Daniel Bridge

Joined: 21st March 2006

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Daniel Bridge
For the saving you'd make, if you were after one, it would be worth checking your not-so-near stores - at that price it would be worth the drive!

Alternatively, shopping around does show the Pentax version at £149 (www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk, possibly others too).

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D or....... at 24/05/2007 - 14:19

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
Do you think the build quality difference would account for the over 5:1 price difference in the two versions of the 50-200mm lens?
Currys at £29.87

Unless Currys have the price wrong.
Frankly, Currys can quote any price they want if there's no hope of anyone buying it at that price. They don't offer home delivery, just a 'reserve and collect' service, but I challenge you to find a store with any in stock.

Click 'Add to Basket', then proceed to checkout, where you can enter your postcode, or town, and they'll show you the stock in your nearest 3 stores.

I bet they don't have any.

Dan

Edit: Should have read Mannesty's post first...

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D or....... at 23/05/2007 - 23:01

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
I think what we need is someone who has both versions of the same lens to perform a visual comparison and real life tests. Matt, get your credit card out
What about Chris at SRS? What better way to encourage us to buy proper Pentax glass, if he shows us that the Samsung stuff is inferior.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D or....... at 22/05/2007 - 14:15

Daniel Bridge
When any material meets another, we have a surface that can reflect light. So a glass/air interface will mean that a certain percentage of light will get reflected from the surface. The amount of light reflected depends on the materials.

The coatings will have different characteristics with regard to the amount of light reflected off their surface, and again at their boundary with the glass. Careful choice of materials means that very little light is reflected.

I think that's it!

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D or....... at 22/05/2007 - 14:13

Daniel Bridge
That's true... Hadn't thought of it that way.

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D or....... at 22/05/2007 - 13:47

Daniel Bridge
Wasn't implying that they didn't have any coatings, just that it would appear to be unlikely that it's SMC. But that doesn't mean it's not...

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D or....... at 22/05/2007 - 13:46

Daniel Bridge
Don't think the Samsung has support for tethered shooting yet. Although it's firmware version is 1.20, there's no mention of a 'Remote Assistant' type of thing. Has all the other enhancements though (wireless flash, extra e-dial functions, etc).

No mention of any coatings at all on the Samsung website. Doesn't even come up in a search. I would have thought if the Samsung lenses had an SMC equivalent, they would be marked as such, although the abbreviation would be different - MFC? (Many Fantastic Coatings)

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D or....... at 22/05/2007 - 12:35

Daniel Bridge
I think you're right about it being a different program Tom!

Does it look anything like this?
Comment Image


Not sure what you mean about "...opening the focus window as opposed to just the tab, renders all the controls in the main window inoperable" : So you can open a focus window? Not just the focus tab on the right hand side?

Don't have the focus area top-left default thing you have.

Zooming in and out on the preview is quick, but, on windows at least, you only get a hi-res rendering at 100%, all others, as far as I know, are lo-res. It's the 100% view that takes a second to render.

It does sound like the versions are quite different.

Just had a look at the Phase One website and a couple of Mac tutorials, and it is surprising how different it is.


Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on channel clipping vs in camera clipping and white balance at 21/05/2007 - 17:52

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
my main objection in cap one is that the preview image is just a preview, and that theres no quick and easy way to view at 100% or indeed on non-aliasing reductions like 25% or 50% the preview doesnt tell you what magnification it is on. so you can never tell if the focus is really right...
Zooming to 100% should be just 2 clicks (or ctrl+alt+0 apparently, but that doesn't seem to work for me ). It takes a second to render properly, but it's fairly quick. Otherwise, you can expand the focus window - when you're on the focus tab, the third icon across the top, at least in the windows version, allows you to show bigger focus previews. I find that these render pretty much instantly.

Magnification is shown top right, along the little status bar, you'll see something like: 71%/17%. The second percentage is the magnification. Haven't been able to figure out the first, but it's 4 times the second.

Click on the magnifying glass, then clicking on the image will zoom in in steps of 25%. You can also use alt+up/down arrow.

Quote:
and the focus tool is slow and clumsy.
Slow - prehaps your processor? Clumsy in what way? That you have to select the tab? Other than that, there's not much to it...

I really like Capture One, and didn't get on with Silkypix. But many others love Silkypix, and if it's the noise reduction you need it may well be the way to go. I tend to use low ISOs when noise ain't a problem!

Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on channel clipping vs in camera clipping and white balance at 21/05/2007 - 15:15

Daniel Bridge
Quote:
If you want to use the "ProPhoto RGB" you should find it in the Color Management Settings of Capture One.
Er, no... Didn't you try the Pro version of C1? Might have been there (which you probably hacked about and got the option in LE ).


Dan

Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on channel clipping vs in camera clipping and white balance at 21/05/2007 - 10:54

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo