All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on I want one of these... at 26/03/2011 - 16:37
I always suspect that lens reviewers should actually take three or four at random to make sure their findings aren't from a one-off rogue lens which slipped through quality control.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on My new 150-500 at 26/03/2011 - 13:32
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 25/03/2011 - 18:38
The DA 35mm f2.4 is absolutely brilliant as a compact standard lens, while the 17-70mm is more flexible but larger. So that's one for when you stuff a camera in your pocket before going into town and one for when you're actively going out to take photos.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on I can't part with the DA 17-70 at 25/03/2011 - 11:39
I keep meaning to track down a cheap MK1 Xbox to fiddle with. You can persuade them to run Linux with a bit of poking about, they make surprisingly good media PCs for photo/video/web browsing.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on External Hard Drive recommendations? at 25/03/2011 - 11:36
Whichever lab Boots use for slide film isn't bad. A bit slow but the results are decent, and given film, processing and postage come in at under £10 you can't really go wrong.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Film developing companies. at 24/03/2011 - 14:02
It was perfect with a Sigma 150-500mm and the K-m though, which is pretty hefty.
The RS centre column and legs do not rotate, and the collar the centre column passes through is relatively deep, which would help avoid flex.
The tiny Slik Mini Pro on the other hand was just about able to handle the MX and SMC Pentax 85-210mm f4.5 without falling over. Not bad with a lens weighing the best part of a kilo unbalancing it (this lens doesn't have a tripod mount and is not recommended with plastic cameras!)
Interestingly the QR plate you have on the 250-600mm would fit my ballhead.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Tripod Advices!? at 24/03/2011 - 12:49
Yeah. Now try picking up a camera and see how quickly it clouds over.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 24/03/2011 - 08:14
Centre columns decrease stability so I avoided them. If you shoot macro, being able to swivel the centre column into horizontal mode to get into awkward places could be the killer feature for you.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Tripod Advices!? at 24/03/2011 - 07:57
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 23/03/2011 - 23:42


It's a nifty little lens and worth having, but didn't come out too well against the M 100mm and M 120mm in a test on another forum. Mine isn't as good as my K 120mm f2.8, although you'll struggle to find one of them (genuinely rare by the look of it - I've never seen another for sale).
I'm not entirely sure what they're selling either - the photo is of the M 135mm which is a K mount but they describe it as an M42 lens. There was an SMC Takumar 135mm f3.5 but it's a very different lens.