All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Film Versus Digital at 01/06/2011 - 16:05
Pentax made a 28-200mm in the FA series (I believe it was made by Tamron who also made their own version, but the Pentax has SMC coatings and Pentax electronics) which has decent reviews, might be worth looking for one if the focal range appeals. You'll get AF and won't have to fiddle about with shake reduction that way as the lens' internal chip will tell the camera what length to set.
In all honesty you're going to be horrified by the results when you put the teleconverter into the mix. TCs in general do not have a good reputation on digital (I had one which was actually worse than cropped images taken with the same lens!)
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Phoenix 28-210mm Lens at 01/06/2011 - 14:22
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Helios lens - does it work? at 01/06/2011 - 14:08
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Resurrecting my ME Super at 01/06/2011 - 08:32
"We would rather serve a thousand Al Quaeda members than one British soldier"
The shop? A funeral director!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 31/05/2011 - 20:16
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Helios lens - does it work? at 31/05/2011 - 07:11
Bear in mind that 28mm is not a wide angle lens on Pentax DSLRs due to the crop factor (the sensor is smaller than a film frame), it's roughly equivalent to a 42mm lens on a film camera when this is taken into account.
I can't really suggest what to set the shake reduction to (this is why it asks for focal length when switched on), I tend to keep my handful of manual zooms on the film bodies as the SR business makes them too fiddly on digital. I do use older primes on digital though.
If you want a really nice 28mm lens for digital (they make good standard walkabout lenses) then look for the SMC Pentax (or SMC Pentax-M) 28mm f3.5. The former is sharper at f3.5 but rarer, they're about equal when stopped down to f8. Both are manual focus and will need stop-down metering, but they're pretty much focus free at f8 or so.
If more money is available then look at the new Pentax DA 35mm f2.4, brilliant lens which takes up very little space and weighs next to nothing.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Phoenix 28-210mm Lens at 30/05/2011 - 22:12
On the plus side we have a pleasantly breezy sunny evening now, after the miserable tupperware grey earlier. Hopefully it'll continue tomorrow as I fancy doing a cross-Wales trip out to Aberaeron then back via Aberystwyth. Got 12 shots left on a roll of slide film in the minty black ME with an M 35mm f2.8 on the front, looking forward to giving it some exercise.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 30/05/2011 - 19:28
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Helios lens - does it work? at 30/05/2011 - 16:51
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Helios lens - does it work? at 30/05/2011 - 15:26


I'll be trying Ilford Delta 3200 on Saturday as I want to get some shots at a party without driving people mad with constant flashes. From experience my DSLR struggles in low light and produces a lot of noise when pushed to that ISO, it also tends to hunt for focus which the Super A won't (was going to use the KX, but the Super A will also handle film of that speed and the LCD is easier to read in low light than the matched needles).
I also find it much easier to go out with a fully manual camera with proper controls (the K-m's main failing is the single control dial, if it had one front and rear like the K7 it'd be much better). I regard a reliable 35mm body loaded with colour slide to be an excellent backup and also handy if you don't want to change lenses - I had an ME Super with 40mm pancake for the static exhibits and the K-m with the 100-300mm zoom for the flying displays at RIAT last year.