All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on What camera... at 21/04/2010 - 08:59
The problem with 'lens type' is that people want the best image possible from their cameras.
I'm not that fussy, although there are lenses I don't use because the IQ is poor.
In a way I'm getting fed up of PP'd images that appear all over the web, if the shot needs so much work then something's wrong. Most of my posted images are straight from the camera, with maybe a little cropping, that's all.
I've posted a few B&Ws lately, but that's because it was B&W film I used. The rush to convert a bland colour to a slightly less bland B&W is starting to get to me.
I'm really not interested in fiddling about in the GIMP, beyond cropping images or doing things like blanking numberplates in photos of vehicles. I'd rather get fundamentally good images by learning how to get the best from the camera and using the best quality lenses I can afford. Now, there is a trick in knowing which old lenses are worth buying - the Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 is better than the f2.8 version, for example. But the best glass on the planet is only a tool. A top of the range saw won't make you a brilliant joiner, but it will help you to get better results than a £5 cheapy from Tesco.
I'm not sure if this is the universally accepted reason why B&W is so revered as a way to learn photography, but I think the way that it forces you to look for texture and shadow rather than simply finding pretty colours helps a lot. Personally I use it for the chance to use old cameras and the fun of developing film at home, plus it's interesting to photograph some things (such as flowers) with the colour removed.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Fed up!! at 20/04/2010 - 22:21
If you fancy a 55mm prime look at this, you'd easily sell it on for £25 or more if you decided you like the focal length and want to get your money back to put towards the DA 55mm.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on 70mm limited as a portrait lens at 20/04/2010 - 12:53
Save your money and think about what end of that range you're after. There are a few Pentax zooms in the 75-300mm "ish" range which have been discussed in a recent thread, if you're after the shorter end then look at the old Pentax-F 35-70mm which is a very sweet compact zoom. The latter is readily available attached to old SFX/SFXn 35mm cameras, in fact it can be cheaper to buy the camera and lens than the lens alone, if you keep an eye out for buy it now prices.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Opinions, Please at 20/04/2010 - 12:46
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Karl Grobl gives up on Canon at 20/04/2010 - 09:29
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 19/04/2010 - 21:41
But it's so tempting!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 19/04/2010 - 20:36
It seems as though the copy doesn't have quite the right thicknesses around the mounting flanges, although it allows infinity focus it doesn't clip in as easily as the genuine one and it needs a special tool (included) to remove it.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Are these really that expensive! at 19/04/2010 - 17:14
There is another thread on the same forum that tells you how to convert a teleconverter with A contacts into a auto Extension tube. Very easy to do and works like a charm.
Assuming the retaining rings are the same as those you find holding lens elements in, with a couple of notches in a metal ring that screws into the body of the TC.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Vivitar 2x macro focusing teleconverter: Auto aperture at 19/04/2010 - 17:05
I have always been impressed that Pentax bother to offer manuals for very old gear like the original KM as free downloads, not many manufacturers go that far!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax UK does it again at 19/04/2010 - 14:57


I have both and can take some photos of the SFX with the AA grip fitted if desired, it makes the grip about 3-4mm wider.