All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on K-r - worth the extra over K-x? at 14/01/2011 - 17:42
IMO the best value fisheye is the Samyang 8mm, the Pentax DA 16-45mm can be found for about the same money if you want an ultra wide angle rather than a fisheye.
Free is even better however - try looking up the Hugin panorama creator software. It's free, brilliant, and means that the angle of your lens is no limitation to the field of view you can build up to. Here is a link to an image made from five shots taken with an 85mm lens. It does help if you use a tripod, and make sure you use the same ISO and aperture for all of the shots, but it's very simple.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on wide angle teleconverter at 13/01/2011 - 20:52
I did manage to get a couple of photos published in a lifestyle magazine recently via a slightly roundabout route (no, I didn't get paid or credited unfortunately). Ages ago I was asked by my old secondary school (where my Mum works) if I could get some shots of their production of "Return to the Forbidden Planet", as apparently the trained professional photographer related to one of the staff had produced pretty rough results (despite being qualified to teach others to use a camera...). I turned up with the K-m and 120mm f2.8 and took loads of shots from the back of the hall, then put the best ones on a USB stick and sent them in. A month or so ago two or three of them turned up in an advert for the school!
I might also get a couple into Land Rover Owner after a friend's Defender was selected as a feature vehicle. I took a handful of shots of it during a greenlaning trip and was asked for copies, this time I did manage to include the request that they credit me as the source if they decide to use them.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 13/01/2011 - 20:35
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Intervalometer for Pentax at 13/01/2011 - 18:57
Comment by Dangermouse posted on K-r - worth the extra over K-x? at 13/01/2011 - 18:52
The kit lens is unlikely to be on there for long anyway, I'm just surprised that they seem to have dropped the idea of matching colours given they already have all the tooling and processes for it.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on K-r - worth the extra over K-x? at 12/01/2011 - 22:42
Comment by Dangermouse posted on K-r - worth the extra over K-x? at 12/01/2011 - 21:13
The rechargeable battery does appeal, but only if it's a halfway decent one. I get about 600-800 shots from a set of Energiser Lithium AAs in my K-m (seldom use the built-in flash).
Does anyone else out there in PU land have a K-r and could they say anything about battery life? I'm definitely leaning towards paying the extra for a red K-r now (or maybe a white one, not entirely sure yet) but I want to be sure there isn't a problem.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on K-r - worth the extra over K-x? at 12/01/2011 - 19:27
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Going on safari, but what do I need? at 11/01/2011 - 22:49
If I do go for the K-r it will probably be red. I like the way the multicoloured ones wind up the "Serious Photographer" types!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on K-r - worth the extra over K-x? at 11/01/2011 - 21:28

