CMW

Joined: 24th July 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

CMW
An impressive selection. I particularly like Disapproval, Heatwave, and International Sisters.

Comment by CMW posted on A Durham photographer's 2013 retrospective at 04/01/2014 - 14:35

CMW
Horst wrote:
The big downturn for companies like Pentax and Minolta etc
started with the Vietnam War, when the war correspondence got rid of the Leica equipment and it was then all Nikon's. They where rugged and relatively large cameras and lenses.

It was big advertised in the captions of the pictures they send back, Also the images of the photographers showed them with the Nikon's hanging around the neck.
I knew US involvement in Vietnam had many ramifications, but there's one I hadn't considered.

I agree with much else that's said in the post, though there's a distinction to be made between niche (as in too small to matter) and niche (as in strongly distinctive). My own hunch is that Pentax either needs to find the second sort of niche or through consolidation find greater critical mass. There is too much evidence in the recent past of poor or rushed decisions, dissipating energy in launching cameras that are sometimes well behind the curve. It doesn't need a crystal ball to suggest that the Pentax part of Ricoh cannot continue for too long on the trajectory followed in its recent past. And I'm sure none is more aware of that that the current managers -- at least I hope so.

Comment by CMW posted on DPR Best DSLR of the year vote at 04/01/2014 - 14:22

CMW
Smeggypants wrote:
CMW wrote:
Smeggy wrote:
'I still think they need a foothold in the Pro market though with a Industry capable FF DSLR even if it's just a loss leader'
A flight of fancy. Companies that care about survival do not knowingly launch a FF camera, with the investment entailed, as a loss-leader.
Of course what I actually said was "even if it's just a loss leader" and wasn't indicating that was the exclusive goal.

Now that's cleared up a loss leader isn't deigned to make a loss, a loss leader is designed to make a profit overall, even if that specific product doesn't break even.

The point is that having a product the pro's use gives the brand credibility and encourages sales in the much larger hobbiest sector.

So, even if a Pentax Pro range didn't turn a profit as long as it generated more profits in the hobby sector and overall for the company then it's a sound investment.

The phrase that most readily comes to mind is slippery slope. If Smeggy joins the board of Ricoh, I may have a camera and some lenses to sell in the classifieds

Comment by CMW posted on DPR Best DSLR of the year vote at 04/01/2014 - 10:34

CMW
On grey, flat days B&W can be the way to go, with its greater reliance on shapes, textures, and tones. But even colour shots can have a value, perhaps only as a reference to remind of the scene's potential in better weather. From a photographer's point of view these dismal days at least have the possibility sometimes of momentarily transforming themselves, and to that extent are much more promising than the sun at midday in summer.

Comment by CMW posted on Why I choose Pentax.... at 03/01/2014 - 23:31

CMW
'I still think they need a foothold in the Pro market though with a Industry capable FF DSLR even if it's just a loss leader'

A flight of fancy. Companies that care about survival do not knowingly launch a FF camera, with the investment entailed, as a loss-leader.

Comment by CMW posted on DPR Best DSLR of the year vote at 03/01/2014 - 23:14

CMW
Gamka wrote:


I have corrected the URL by removing the full stop at the end ...

http://recoverfab.com/company.php
thanks!

Comment by CMW posted on memory card error at 03/01/2014 - 15:58

CMW
cabstar wrote:
Corporations typically separate all businesses from each other, for accounting purposes and other reasons.
...which is what I said.

Comment by CMW posted on DPR Best DSLR of the year vote at 03/01/2014 - 15:55

CMW
cabstar wrote:
Well Ricoh are still very profitable so must be doing the right things. And despite not being a major camera manufacturer in the realm of Canon and Nikon they are still a large company with a marketing department and various PR departments.
Ricoh's size is an asset to their camera division in the sense that there is a better chance of getting funding for projects that deserve backing. But I would be surprised if in terms of balance sheets Ricoh did not require each of its divisions to stand apart. In other words, the size of Ricoh's marketing overall is unlikely to have any bearing on what can be spent by its camera division.

Comment by CMW posted on DPR Best DSLR of the year vote at 03/01/2014 - 15:19

CMW
MattyH wrote:
At the end of the day Ricoh/Pentax can spend all its money on advertising, but in my opinion it will not make any difference until they start making cameras the greater public want or even desire.
Rather harsh. We may all have some reservations about some of the cameras, but the best are, well, up there with the best. It's hard to say the K3 (as a camera, leaving aside the virtues of the different systems) is not on a par with the D7100. Given a bit of time, they'll probably settle to similar prices, too

Comment by CMW posted on DPR Best DSLR of the year vote at 03/01/2014 - 13:52

CMW
If the Windows PC brings no joy -- ie the card remains unrecognised -- you might try http://recoverfab.com/company.php. I can't vouch for their service, as I haven't (so far) had to use it. But I have it noted as a 'useful address', having come across positive mentions on the Internet. Quite pricey, though, so it depends how important the photos are to you.

Comment by CMW posted on memory card error at 03/01/2014 - 13:41

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo