Clarky

Joined: 19th July 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Clarky
Hi Amber and welcome to the forum.

I own both the Bigma and DA*300mm and as Mannesty says the zooms will not out perform the primes at the long end.

The bigma is good in bright conditions as you say but the 300 is outstanding. Pay the little bit extra and get the 300 would be my advice and a good quality teleconverter to go with it if you want the extra length. I have a Kenko 1.4 and 2.0 TC. cheers.

Comment by Clarky posted on deciding on long lenses - bigma / 300mm prime at 29/12/2008 - 00:38

Clarky
A merry X-mas to all.

As Santa will be here in Aust about 12hrs before you guys. Are there any last requests I can pass on to him.

[IMG]http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x261/ClarkyinAus/c6b74ca0.jpg[/IMG]

Comment by Clarky posted on Christmas Greetings at 24/12/2008 - 10:59

Clarky
Daniel Bridge wrote:
Mike-P wrote:
The fact they will not answer a question through Ebay but will if you use their email address rings alarm bells.
And selling a £155 flashgun for £8.73 doesn't?

Dan
Well it is the silly season after all.

A super Takumar 50mm 1.4 sold last night on E-bay for AU$200

Comment by Clarky posted on Anyone fancy their chances with this one? at 24/12/2008 - 02:30

Clarky
Do they both have the exif info available. That should tell you. but they sure look like one and the same.

Comment by Clarky posted on Spot the Difference at 23/12/2008 - 12:50

Clarky
Thanks Matt, I'm not after this lens as i'm more than happy with my *16-50. But the extra length would be handy

Gotta love that SDM

Is the 17-70 weather sealed :

Comment by Clarky posted on SMC-DA 17-70 f/4 A:[IF] SDM at 23/12/2008 - 12:14

Clarky
Hi snootchies and welcome to the forum.

I would go with option 3, I didn't think you could still get the MK1 18-55, I thought is was discontinued, must be old stock, As far as I am concerned the difference between the MKI and MKII is minimal, so if it saves you a few quid then I would go for it.

The 55-300 is fantastic but considerably more than the 50-200 which is also very good.

Maybe go with option 1 and pick yourself up a 50mm A 1.4 or 1.7. Good luck.

Comment by Clarky posted on Need help deciding what to purchase with my K20D next month at 23/12/2008 - 11:32

Clarky
Merry X-mas to all and a happy and prosporous new year.

I'm off down the coast and some beach bumming. but i'll be thinking of you all.

Comment by Clarky posted on Merry Xmas To You All at 23/12/2008 - 10:02

Clarky
Its a very popular lens on a Pentax DSLR, Although most prefer the A series.
I have an M 1.7 and mostly use it reversed on my K20 or DS for macro.

Its an excellent lens and gives excellent results for what you can pick them up for. All the Pentax nifty fifties 1.4, 1.7 and 2.0 are good and would be surprised if any forum members doesn't have at least one of them. cheers

Comment by Clarky posted on Anyone using Pentax M 50mm F 1.7 on DSLR still ? at 23/12/2008 - 01:27

Clarky
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
the warmth, comfort and sucker of the Pentax bosom....
I really really hope you mean "succour".....

Comment by Clarky posted on Sigma 120-400 f4.5-5.6 APO DG HSM at 22/12/2008 - 10:13

Clarky
I think Mike-P has this one and uses it with a PKA adaptall 2 mount.

I would say yes it would allow shutter priority and be surprised if it didn't. Mike will know, he has the all seeing eye

Comment by Clarky posted on Tamron SP 90 at 22/12/2008 - 10:09

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo