All Forum Comments
Comment by ChrisA posted on Question/comment -- Weekly Competition - The Number Six at 08/07/2007 - 12:06
After the judging, feel free to tell me how much you disagree, or even agree, with my choice and reasoning.
chrisA has offered a very colourful image but I did have to search a little for the "6" and I thought the composition somewhat confused. Perhaps next time a simpler approach to the brief and a more obvious message?
Comment by ChrisA posted on Question/comment -- Weekly Competition - The Number Six at 08/07/2007 - 11:24
I don't expect to be burgled, or for the house to burn down, so I think that the most convenient way to safely store data is on hard disks, with each original file on one set of disks and a copy on another.
The house didn't burn down, but the PSU developed a fault and caused a fire inside the case, which trashed both disks, and vented a lot of smoke out through the exhaust fan.
Personally, I wouldn't use the word "safely" in conjunction with any solution that has all the data inside one case. Or even one building, really - but you pays your money and you takes your choice. There's no single right answer to this one, sadly. Like how good a picture is, "safe enough" is very much in the eye of the beholder.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Storage suggestions? at 01/07/2007 - 19:27
ultra-ata-ide
Current motherboards priced below £100 have 6 SATA connections already, with no need to go to add-on cards. They'll have RAID on board, so you'd be able to pair up the drives for redundancy.
Putting more than 6 drives in a case is getting a bit specialist anyway, and even with 6 you'd be generating a fair amount of heat to worry about.
How much data do you actually need to keep, George? How much of it changes, how often? How much of it really needs to be instantly available?
It may be that 'cheap no good, and good no cheap'.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Storage suggestions? at 01/07/2007 - 17:07
I might perhaps need a new case, with a good power supply.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Storage suggestions? at 01/07/2007 - 14:47
Comment by ChrisA posted on Weekly Competition - The Number Six at 07/07/2007 - 00:08
Okay, I have realised that I only want the K10D as a new toy. I need to concentrate in improving my photography with my K100D, which is a perfectly good camera.....deep breaths....ahhhhh.
My experience was of only frustration and resentment. I'd used proper metal scissors at home without injury, and had made some quite nice Christmas decorations. 'Nice' from the perspective of a five year old, I grant you, but bear with me...
I'm not for a moment suggesting that there's anything wrong with the K100D. Everything I've heard suggests that it's very good.
But I do think that getting the best materials will enhance, not detract from, the learning process. There's no point imposing an artificial constraint by choosing something less capable, just to put you under more pressure to improve.
If you care enough about quality, you'll create enough pressure on yourself without asking the equipment to add even more.
Comment by ChrisA posted on K10D with lens for £500 at 02/07/2007 - 23:27
Now it's £500.
Should I have waited?
NO WAY!!
I've had a lot of fun with it in the last 6 months. Learned a lot, taken a few pics I'm pleased with, and lots that other people like.
Well worth the £200. You can't worry forever about the fact that the price will be lower tomorrow. That way lies never having the thing at all.
Comment by ChrisA posted on K10D with lens for £500 at 01/07/2007 - 02:37
But please:
Lightning is the subject of the pictures.
Lightening is what you do if something's too dark.
Sorry, pedant mode off now
Comment by ChrisA posted on Lightening Pics for Critique at 31/07/2007 - 12:27
I like the light and cloud formation but is there anything I can do to make it better?
Comment by ChrisA posted on Lightening Pics for Critique at 30/06/2007 - 11:16



When you say this, may I ask, where did you eventually find 'the number 6' in my photo?
Such was the thought process. It is of course entirely possible that I have missed something, judges do all the time, if so I'd be interested to know what your take on it was.
But when I saw a number 110 bus go past (110 is is indeed the number six, in binary), it jumped out at me, computer geek that I am. My original plan was to attempt a light trails thing, opening the shutter when it signalled to move, and leaving it open on B for a few seconds. But this would clearly have been imprudent, on a Friday night with drinkers milling around so I gave up on that. In the end, I took the photo, hand-held from inside the car, with no expectation that it would be in the least bit interesting.
When I had a look at it, though, there was just one redeeming feature that made me think it was worth submitting.
110 is the number six in binary - the language of computers. And the bus just happened to be parked outside a computer shop, and the reflection of its name is clearly visible in the shot. So the binary number 6, with the reflection (mirror-reversed) of the word "computers" saved the shot for me. I did consider cropping the number plate out, but that was the number 363, not the number six, so I left it in intentionally.
I agree with your comments. Just a bit of amusement for me, really. A photo like the back end of a bus, perhaps...