cabstar

Joined: 2nd May 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

cabstar
Gwyn wrote:
gartmore wrote:
I know we all love SRS but why send the camera to them when all they do is send it to Johnsons which you could have done yourself and saved time and Cris some work.
Because by law you have to take it up with the retailer if you are making a warranty claim.
Wow will this warrant a visit by the boys in blue if you dont't???

Comment by cabstar posted on K5 'jack in the box' - credit to SRS at 06/02/2012 - 00:36

cabstar
Here you go

K-01 specs pdf

Comment by cabstar posted on K-01 - Black Version? at 06/02/2012 - 00:06

cabstar
on the official PDF launch document it states black & black as an option...

Comment by cabstar posted on K-01 - Black Version? at 06/02/2012 - 00:04

cabstar
I find when you complain and don't get any satisfaction find out their press or communications office. These have way more power than cs or call centre staff.

I had reason to complain about some facilities and the handling of my complaint.

They met be on site asked me for my suggestions. Next year they emailed be telling me why they had done and asked me to tell them how they did. It was amazing. Everything I said had been implemented by them.

Comment by cabstar posted on Jessops bad attitude at 03/02/2012 - 18:44

cabstar
ronniemac wrote:
Its an age thing. Since turning 40 I need to put on reading glasses for anything close to me, like an l.c.d. display. Then I have to take them off again to look at the subject I am photographing. That’s not to mention the fact that even with glasses, in strong sunlight I can’t make out the LCD image on the back of the camera. I can manage fine without glasses all the time when looking through a viewfinder, optical or electronic – even if the latter is inferior. That’s why, sadly, there is no point in me even thinking about getting a K-01.

I guess I am waiting for something similar from Pentax with EVF, even better with FF. Myself apart hats off to Pentax for breaking new ground in such a bold manner, I hope the K-01 is a big success.

But then, hats seriously back on again for the price hike as the camera crosses the Atlantic. $749 = £474, NOT £630 (that’s a 33% more to buy here than in the US). This country is so Velcro.
If only it was as simple as that exchange rates fluctuate so there has to be a margin involved there plus the VAT element....

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 17:48

cabstar
A 16-85 2.8??? Can you imagine the weight and size of the front elemant??

Comment by cabstar posted on New Pentax lens roadmap at 03/02/2012 - 17:22

cabstar
I think its a great idea that they stuck with the k-mount, puts faith in lens buying.

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 11:31

cabstar
the tax was a levy on video cameras for the movie industry because mini dv recorderss originally had dv in plug so could make digital copies, hence why most dv camcorders after that discarded the DV in socket...

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax K-01 and Open Day! at 03/02/2012 - 11:18

cabstar
Having handled the Nikon 1 and its 60 fps I am surprised the k-01 only managers 6, I thought it was the mirror box that slowed the frame rate down, particularly as the k-01 has an electronic shutter.

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 09:46

cabstar
I think a DA lens will be more likely f/5.6 a DA* I would assume to be an f/4 lens which would be stupid money...

Comment by cabstar posted on New Pentax lens roadmap at 03/02/2012 - 01:52

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo