cabstar

Joined: 2nd May 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

cabstar
This is really really easy to resolve.

You write to them explaining the problem with your camera and under SOGA goods must be of satisfactory quality, the fact your expensive camera has broken within two years shows it is off unsatisfactory quality. Along with a letter you include printouts of the forms filled in on moneyline don't pay yet. In the,enter state you are giving them 7 days to rectify this issue by replacing your camera with a new one or court proceedings will be commenced upon.

On the claim form you put you are claiming the cost of the camera, plus any phone calls, postage costs incurred so far and the cost for suing them, costs are in the money claim site which I think is around £75 now.

I guarantee ey will resolve before court proceedings.

Why is this successful??? When you claim through money claim you are actually using a form if county court based in Northampton. When you win a case like this the company you are suing gets a county court judgement, they will then have to pay or face a winding up order, during this time the companies credit rating gets affected.

So rather than do all that they will pay up....

Write to the MD or CEO if you like but they won't do anything, hence going the 7 day route.

Comment by cabstar posted on Could someone give me some advice please. at 10/10/2012 - 17:31

cabstar
helios wrote:
I wonder who will actually buy a FF Pentax DSLR. I doubt if many professionals will unless Pentax can organise a full professional backup service with fast servicing, lens hire etc.

That leaves the enthusiastic amateurs. With recent advances in sensor technology the improvement in image quality is going to be fairly small although there are undeniable advantages if using narrow depth of focus is important. FF lenses tend to be bigger and heavier as well as more expensive.

Recent trends point to a desire for smaller lighter cameras, hence the increasing popularity of small system mirror-less cameras. I think Pentax might struggle to achieve the sales volumes necessary to keep unit costs down sufficiently to compete with the big boys at Canikon.
I will be buying one and my new k-5 mkiis will be my second body with my current k-5 as backup.

Nikon service has recently been shocking by all accounts with turnarounds longer than two weeks. I think once Pentax launch full frame they will have to improve their pro service..

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax FF DSLR - confirmed at 10/10/2012 - 17:20

cabstar
The d600 can already be had for £1659 from SRS

Imagine the price pentax will need to launch at in 2013/14

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax FF DSLR - confirmed at 10/10/2012 - 13:28

cabstar
Impressed with that interview, particularly the thoughts about sub 2400usd ff bodies. If that the market they're going for by 2013/4 the price will be a lot less than that,,also the discussion about new lenses for FF fits in with the new patent for the 70-200mm 2.8

Updated 645d is also good new, with the launch of ff pentax will be the only manufacture of interchangeable lens bodies from small factor the q to mf the 645d, fascinating turnaround if they can pull it off...

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax FF DSLR - confirmed at 10/10/2012 - 10:09

cabstar
The 35mm da lens is supposed to be the same construction as the 35mm f/2 also catching kids running around at f/1.8 is going to be difficult I would have thought.

Those test shots do look very soft, I would return for an exchange and not bother waiting for Pentax to reply.

Comment by cabstar posted on Pentax DA50mm f1.8 new lens green fringing at 10/10/2012 - 00:26

cabstar
I used a Chinese version. It can't import raws so I save as jpeg within the camera and upload that way. The camera connect can only import from a dsc folder.

Not sure about a raw viewer app.

I have found e iPad disappointing as a photography tool but superb for showing off portfolios.

Comment by cabstar posted on iPad camera connector kit at 09/10/2012 - 20:57

cabstar
Pentaxonian wrote:
£250 for a plastic lens with no built in motor in 2012 is just taking the piss, no matter how good it is.

NB Nikon's AF-S 50 f1.8 sells for £160 (which includes a hood and pouch)
That lens was around £210 at launch and that lens does not have motorised af either So what's your point??? I would guess in a years time the da 50mm will be around e same price as the Nikon...

Comment by cabstar posted on SMC Pentax-DA 50mm f/1.8 at 09/10/2012 - 16:06

cabstar
I agree with Doug, I had exactly the same experience when I did a level photography.

Comment by cabstar posted on I've been shooting in the Dark for a few years(as in not showing my shit to anyone) at 09/10/2012 - 11:39

cabstar
As John says there are many photo agencies out there that deal with this kind of thing, that way you can licence them out and keep the originals

Comment by cabstar posted on Old motor racing photos from 1953 at 08/10/2012 - 19:55

cabstar
If looking at clubs beware of the difference between photography clubs and camera clubs.

Some just talk about gear and compare their gear to other members without looking at any photography and wouldn't know Henry Cartier Bresson from their David bailey.

Photography clubs talk photos, art, photographers etc.

You will not know the difference until you go into one, beware....

Comment by cabstar posted on I've been shooting in the Dark for a few years(as in not showing my shit to anyone) at 08/10/2012 - 19:53

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo