All Forum Comments
Comment by bjolester posted on Samyang 14mm f2.8 experience at 31/01/2012 - 10:20
In Norway many Northern Lights photographers seem to use the Tokina AT-X 11-16 f2.8, but the Samyang 14mm f2.8 has also become quite popular. Do any of you have any experience with the Samyang 14mm?
Bjørn
Comment by bjolester posted on Samyang 14mm f2.8 experience at 31/01/2012 - 09:38
I have to agree with John. The first complaint should be with Tokina. I'm sure their reputation is very important to them. If nothing is said. Chances are it will happen again to some other poor soul...
Based on reports on other forums , I am not the first Tokina owner to experience trouble with TSE. There have been other "pour souls" before me...
Comment by bjolester posted on BEWARE! Tokina Service Europe at 30/01/2012 - 06:10
There are few things that irritate me more than sloppy repair work like this, wether it is done to my car, my musical instruments ( I am a musician), or indeed my camera equipment. I might have blown off too much steam in this tread, but I believe that negative experiences like mine with TSE should also be shared.
Bjørn
Comment by bjolester posted on BEWARE! Tokina Service Europe at 29/01/2012 - 22:52
If you're still unhappy with the repair, why not take it up with Tokina and give them a chance to put it right. I'm sure most repair houses would want to investigate what went wrong, otherwise lots of complaints could follow. If there's a problem, let them sort it before it becomes a bigger problem, hopefully they will appreciate it.
Comment by bjolester posted on BEWARE! Tokina Service Europe at 29/01/2012 - 18:35
Disappointing to hear that Tokina Service is so bad
I've got the same lens so I'll just have to keep my fingers crossed
that it continues to work well.
I had even considered buying a different make of camera so that
I could buy the latest Tokina 80-400mm
Comment by bjolester posted on BEWARE! Tokina Service Europe at 29/01/2012 - 17:15
About half a year ago I by ended up with buying two Tokina ATX 80-400mm lenses. The first one was a version 1 (without tripod collar) that I purchased off eBay for USD340. The price was good, but the lens was not. When it arrived I realized that the zoom mechanism was damaged. There was zoom unevenness around 300mm and sometimes the zoom got stuck in one position, and it needed prolonged manipulation to resume normal function. In the midst of deep irritation with this purchase I found a "mint" version 2 on "pentaxforums.com" that I purchased. This lens arrived in truly immaculate condition, it is really superb.
Now back to my unhappy eBay purchase. After having done some research I sent the version 1 to Tokina Service Europe in the Netherlands on the 13. october 2011. In the beginning of November I got an email from the Netherlands stating that the zoom mechanism damage could be repaired for EURO 180,- I accepted this price, and the lens arrived by UPS in the middle of November. The first thing I noticed when examining the lens was that the zoom no longer got stuck in one position, but the unevenness around 300mm was still there. I called TSE on the phone to ask about this, and they told me that they would have to change the whole zoom-rail-mechanism in the lens to deal with the unevenness. I was also told that this was a common problem with this lens (if it had had some kind of impact damage) and that most people just got used to it being like this. It would cost another EURO 240,- to change the whole zoom-rail-mechanism.
While I was considering what to do, I noticed some days afterwards that there was some grease on the inside of the front element, and also some loose metal bits. Closer examination also revealed that the front element came into contact with the inner metal tubing when fully compressed. There was already a circular imprint on the glass. (photo 1)
I sent a letter of complaint to TSE, and on the 29. November I returned the lens. Some weeks later I sent an email stating that I would also like to have the zoom-rail-mechanism 100% fixed according to previous price estimate (EURO 240,-).
On Thursday last week I received the lens from the Netherlands. I took me about 30 seconds of examination to register the following defects:
1. The front glass element had been changed, but not cleaned on the inside. It is full of dirt. (photo 2)
2. The "beauty ring" covering the inner zoom tubing is partly loose and comes into contact with the front element when using the lens at 80mm. This will eventually mark the inside of the front element. (photo 3)
3. The zoom ring unevenness is still there. They had not repaired the zoom mechanism fully, like I asked for.
4. The lens arrived with a Sigma bottom cap, not the original Tokina that I sent along. The Sigma cap hardly fits at all.
They did not charge me anything for the second repair, but I had to pay about GBP 30 in postage.
Am I happy with the quality of repair and competence of TSE ? No!!!!
Will I ever send anything to TSE for service or repair? No way!!!!
Will I ever buy any other Tokina lenses, with my knowledge of repair and service possibilities in Europe? Very doubtful.
I Norway we have a brilliant Pentax technician, I probably will stick to "Pentax-only" in the future. Then I can rest assured that if something gets broken or needs service, there is a dedicated technician that will fix it.
Regards from "No-longer-a-Tokina-afficianado"
Bjørn
Photo 1:
[IMG]http://i812.photobucket.com/albums/zz50/bjolester/80_400_0.jpg[/IMG]
Photo 2:
[IMG]http://i812.photobucket.com/albums/zz50/bjolester/80_400_2.jpg[/IMG]
Photo 3:
[IMG]http://i812.photobucket.com/albums/zz50/bjolester/80_400_1.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by bjolester posted on BEWARE! Tokina Service Europe at 29/01/2012 - 11:48
Comment by bjolester posted on Fortnightly competition 86 Golden Hour discussion area at 26/01/2012 - 18:47
"Typically, lighting is softer (more diffuse) and warmer in hue, and shadows are longer. When the sun is near the horizon, sunlight travels through more of the atmosphere, reducing the intensity of the direct light, so that more of the illumination comes from indirect light from the sky (Thomas 1973, 9–13), reducing the lighting ratio. More blue light is scattered, so that light from the sun appears more reddish. In addition, the sun's small angle with the horizon produces longer shadows." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_hour_(photography))
All photos to be taken with Pentax cameras or the Samsung clones.
Competition closes at 1800 GMT 08.02.2012
Comment by bjolester posted on Fortnightly competition 86 Golden Hour entries at 26/01/2012 - 18:45
Best regards
Bjørn
Comment by bjolester posted on Fortnightly competition 85 Skies entries. at 25/01/2012 - 23:38


There are some very good reports/sample pics on the US forum. It has a bit of barrel distortion but looks surprisingly sharp right from f2.8 - check the sample pic of the street with the church at the end on the Canon APSC review on Photozone.de!
The only thing that would put me off this lens is the size - it's a full frame mega-wide lens which is 'only' about 21mm on APSC....